Saurí J J
Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1980 Dec;26(4):283-92.
The delusional text organizes and disposes itself in a peculiar way. Certain organizators --in Eugenio's case there are five--conform to a distributive pattern charged of the distribution of the text sequences. But delusion is not disorder and Eugenio's text is organized in the axe "dependence-law" in its double meaning of "precept sanction vs. observance and infraction". This dualism is characteristic of the delusional text and its coherence depends on the articulation between sequences. This text is defined by these relations and does not constitute an "illness" as naturalism thought. It is an attempt to answer, though in a deviated and distorted way, questions that the world poses building, thus, a different world. The delusional polisemia grown out of this conective signification is, at the same time, metonimic. This last character is of great importance as it bears an influence on the signification and pushes it into a rational "restauration". This is the task of the argumentation. But the structure, which was conective at first, becomes afterwards implicative. The meaning becomes its opposite and changes its order. This process is not total and, on the text, there are intermediate meanings in coexistance. When the meaning inverts its order it results in the configuration of the special kind of negation which is proper of this delusional text.
妄想性文本以一种奇特的方式组织和安排自身。某些组织者——在欧金尼奥的例子中有五个——符合一种负责文本序列分布的分布模式。但妄想并非无序，欧金尼奥的文本在“依赖-法则”轴线上以“戒律制裁与遵守和违反”的双重意义进行组织。这种二元论是妄想性文本的特征，其连贯性取决于序列之间的衔接。这个文本由这些关系所定义，并不像自然主义思想所认为的那样构成一种“疾病”。它是一种试图以一种偏离和扭曲的方式回答世界所提出问题的尝试，从而构建一个不同的世界。这种由这种连接意义产生的妄想性一词多义，同时也是隐喻性的。最后这个特征非常重要，因为它对意义产生影响并将其推向一种理性的“恢复”。这就是论证的任务。但起初具有连接性的结构，之后变成了蕴含性的。意义变得与其相反并改变了其顺序。这个过程并非完全如此，在文本上存在共存的中间意义。当意义颠倒其顺序时，就会导致这种妄想性文本所特有的那种特殊否定的构型。
