Ruggero M A
J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Feb;67(2):707-10. doi: 10.1121/1.383900.
There exist in the literature three attempts to derive basilar membrane travel times from the phase versus frequency characteristics of responses to tones in the auditory nerve [Anderson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 4., 1131-1139 (1971)], cochlear nucleus [Gibson et al., in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, edited by Evans and Wilson (Academic, New York, 1977), pp. 57-68], and basilar membrane [Robles et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 926-939 (1976)]. It is argued in this paper that these derivations probably have overestimated the actual mechanical travel times. Travel time was originally defined by von Békésy as the latency between the onset of a click stimulus and the onset of basilar membrane vibration. For a linear bandpass system, the frequency-domain equivalent of this latency is the high-frequency asymptotoic slope of the phase lag versus frequency characteristic, which is not generally a linear function. In the neural studies (auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus) it was assumed that the phase versus frequency characteristic was a straight line. Slopes derived under a linear assumption are probably closer to the weighted average group delay (i.e., the center of gravity of the click response) than they are to travel time. In the Mössbauer study of basilar membrane mechanics the latency of the response to clicks was compared with the low-frequency slope of the phase characteristic. The comparison should have been made with the high-frequency slope.
文献中有三次尝试从听神经对纯音反应的相位与频率特性中推导基底膜传播时间[安德森等人,《美国声学学会杂志》4,1131 - 1139(1971)]、耳蜗核[吉布森等人,载于《听觉的心理物理学与生理学》,埃文斯和威尔逊编(学术出版社,纽约,1977),第57 - 68页]以及基底膜[罗布尔斯等人,《美国声学学会杂志》59,926 - 939(1976)]。本文认为这些推导可能高估了实际的机械传播时间。传播时间最初由冯·贝凯西定义为喀哒声刺激开始与基底膜振动开始之间的潜伏期。对于线性带通系统,这个潜伏期在频域中的等效值是相位滞后与频率特性的高频渐近斜率,而这通常不是一个线性函数。在神经研究(听神经和耳蜗核)中,假设相位与频率特性是一条直线。在线性假设下得出的斜率可能更接近加权平均群延迟(即喀哒声反应的重心),而不是传播时间。在对基底膜力学的穆斯堡尔研究中,将对喀哒声的反应潜伏期与相位特性的低频斜率进行了比较。应该与高频斜率进行比较。