Suppr超能文献

间隔训练与高密度强化对拼写习得和记忆的影响。

The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention.

作者信息

Neef N A, Iwata B A, Page T J

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;13(1):153-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-153.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of interspersing known items during spelling instruction on new words for three mentally retarded students. Following a baseline consisting of the presentation of 10 test words per session, a multielement design was implemented. During interspersal training sessions, previously mastered words were presented alternately with each of 10 test words. During high-density reinforcement sessions, 10 test words were presented and additional reinforcement was provided for task-related behaviors. Throughout all conditions, test words were deleted and replaced after meeting a mastery criterion. Periodic retention tests were administered over mastered words and a cumulative retention test was administered at the end of the experiment. Results showed that high-density reinforcement did facilitate performance over baseline; however, intersperal training was superior to the other conditions in terms of both acquisition rate and short- and long-term retention. In addition, students preferred the interspersal condition when offered a choice.

摘要

本研究调查了在拼写教学过程中穿插已知单词对三名智障学生学习新单词的影响。在每次课程呈现10个测试单词的基线阶段之后,实施了多元素设计。在穿插训练阶段,将之前掌握的单词与10个测试单词中的每一个交替呈现。在高密度强化阶段,呈现10个测试单词,并对与任务相关的行为提供额外强化。在所有条件下,当测试单词达到掌握标准后,将其删除并替换。对已掌握的单词进行定期的保持测试,并在实验结束时进行累积保持测试。结果表明,高密度强化确实比基线阶段更有助于提高表现;然而,就习得率以及短期和长期保持而言,穿插训练优于其他条件。此外,当提供选择时,学生更喜欢穿插条件。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Some contingencies of spelling.一些拼写方面的偶然情况。
Anal Verbal Behav. 1987;5:1-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03392815.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验