Davies C T
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Apr;48(4):702-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.4.702.
The aerobic energy cost (delta VO2) of running at different speeds (V) with and against a range of wind velocities (WV) has been studied in a wind tunnel on three healthy male subjects and the results compared with downhill and uphill gradient running on a motor-driven treadmill. In terms of equivalent horizontal and vertical forces, comparison showed that the two forms of exercise were physiologically identical for gradients and WV ranging from -10 to +5% and 1.5 to 15 m . s-1, respectively. The apparent mechanical efficiencies of the work performed with a head and following wind were approximately +0.35 and -1.2. At WV greater than 15 m . s-1 it was more efficient to run against the wind and the corresponding gradient on the treadmill. At high WV the subjects altered their posture and "leaned" into the wind, thus possibly converting potential drag into body lift. The energy cost of overcoming air resistance on a calm day outdoor was calculated to be 7.8% for sprinting (10 m . s-1), 4% middle-distance (6 m . s-1), and 2% marathon (5 m . s-1) running.
在风洞中对三名健康男性受试者进行了研究,测量了他们在不同风速(WV)下顺风和逆风以不同速度(V)跑步时的有氧能量消耗(ΔVO₂),并将结果与在电动跑步机上进行的下坡和上坡跑步进行了比较。就等效水平力和垂直力而言,比较表明,对于分别在-10%至+5%以及1.5至15 m·s⁻¹范围内的坡度和风速,这两种运动形式在生理上是相同的。顺风和逆风跑步时的表观机械效率分别约为+0.35和-1.2。当风速大于15 m·s⁻¹时,逆风跑步以及在跑步机上以相应坡度跑步效率更高。在高风速下,受试者会改变姿势,“迎着”风倾斜身体,从而可能将潜在的阻力转化为身体升力。计算得出,在室外无风的日子里,短跑(10 m·s⁻¹)克服空气阻力的能量消耗为7.8%,中距离跑(6 m·s⁻¹)为4%,马拉松跑(5 m·s⁻¹)为2%。