Bakeman R, Brown J V
Child Dev. 1980 Jun;51(2):437-47.
Interaction during feeding sessions between preterm infants and their mothers and that between full-term infants and their mothers were compared. (Mothers and babies were from a low-income, inner-city population.) When the children were about 3 years old, they attended a day camp for 3 weeks, during which their cognitive ability (Stanford-Binet) and social ability (both social competence and social participation) were assessed. Early interaction was quite different for preterms and full-terms, but in general it did not predict either social or cognitive ability at age 3. Birth status (preterm/full-term) did predict cognitive (but not social) ability: preterms scored lower. Finally, the children of mothers who were more emotionally and verbally responsive during a home visit at 20 months exhibited more social and cognitive ability at age 3. These results suggest that the baby, within broad normal limits, may be "buffered" against any long-term consequences of interaction during the first few months of life.
对早产儿与其母亲之间以及足月儿与其母亲之间在喂养期间的互动进行了比较。(母亲和婴儿来自低收入的市中心人口。)当孩子大约3岁时,他们参加了为期3周的日间夏令营,在此期间对他们的认知能力(斯坦福-比奈智力量表)和社交能力(社交能力和社交参与度)进行了评估。早产儿和足月儿的早期互动有很大不同,但总体而言,它并不能预测3岁时的社交或认知能力。出生状态(早产/足月)确实能预测认知能力(但不能预测社交能力):早产儿得分较低。最后,在孩子20个月大时进行家访时,那些在情感和言语上反应更积极的母亲的孩子在3岁时表现出更强的社交和认知能力。这些结果表明,在广泛的正常范围内,婴儿可能会“缓冲”生命最初几个月互动带来的任何长期影响。