Rosenthal R H, Allen T W
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1980 Jun;8(2):175-87. doi: 10.1007/BF00919062.
Previous laboratory studies that have either introduced extraneous enviromental stimulation or tested children in cubicles have failed to provide support for the common clinical notion that hyperkinetic children are highly distractible. Based on the Rosenthal and Allen (1978) proposal, distractibility was investigated by introducing irrelevant information within the task context. Intratask distractibility was examined by comparing the performance of hyperkinetic and nonhyperkinetic children on a speeded classification task. Errors measured for responses to slides containing either zero, constant, one varying, or two varying irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Dimensional salience of the three dimensions used in the study was measured for each child. The data indicate that hyperkinetics made more errors than nonhyperkinetics when constant irrelevant or two varying irrelevant dimensions were presented, but the two groups made equal errors when there was no irrelevant information presented within the stimulus array. No group differences in distractibility were found when the irrelevant dimension was low salience. It was concluded that salience of distractors presented within the task context may be useful in specifying the particular task conditions in which hyperkinetic children exhibit high distractibility.
以往的实验室研究,要么引入了外部环境刺激,要么在小隔间里对儿童进行测试,均未能为多动症儿童极易分心这一常见临床观点提供支持。基于罗森塔尔和艾伦(1978年)的提议,通过在任务情境中引入无关信息来研究分心情况。通过比较多动症儿童和非多动症儿童在一项快速分类任务中的表现,来考察任务内分心情况。对包含零个、恒定的、一个变化的或两个变化的无关刺激维度的幻灯片的反应错误进行了测量。对研究中使用的三个维度的维度显著性,针对每个儿童进行了测量。数据表明,当呈现恒定无关维度或两个变化的无关维度时,多动症儿童比非多动症儿童犯的错误更多,但当刺激阵列中没有呈现无关信息时,两组犯的错误相同。当无关维度显著性较低时,未发现两组在分心方面存在差异。得出的结论是,在任务情境中呈现的干扰物的显著性,可能有助于确定多动症儿童表现出高度分心的特定任务条件。