Mueller-Brennecke D L, Reed S J, Waisner D L
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1980 Sep;63(5):1038-43.
New automated and manual turbidimetric microbiological assay methods for oxytetracycline (OTC) in finished feeds and a feed premix were submitted to 17 collaborating laboratories for comparison with the official AOAC method. Six finished feeds of 50 and 100 g/ton levels and one premix containing 20 g OTC/lb were sent to the collaborators. Results were received from 12 laboratories. Six laboratories provided results derived from the Autoturb System and 7 laboratories poerformed the turbidimetric analyses manually. All 12 laboratories assayed the samples by the AOAC cylinder-plate method. Ranges of recoveraies expressed as percent were 89.5-102.0, 91.2-97.0, and 91.4-96.0 for the AOAC, Autoturb turbidimetric, and manual turbidimetric methods, respectively. Average recoveries were 96.3, 93.4, and 93.6%, respectively. The mean relative standard deviation values were 5.7, 6.3, and 7.2, respectively. There was little significant difference between the turbidimetric methods and the AOAC method; however, the turbidimetric methods were faster.
针对成品饲料和饲料预混物中土霉素(OTC)含量的新型自动化和手动比浊微生物检测方法被提交给17个合作实验室,以便与美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)的标准方法进行比较。向合作实验室发送了六种含量分别为50克/吨和100克/吨的成品饲料,以及一种每磅含20克土霉素的预混物。收到了12个实验室的结果。六个实验室提供了自动比浊系统得出的结果,七个实验室手动进行了比浊分析。所有12个实验室均采用AOAC圆筒平板法对样品进行检测。AOAC法、自动比浊法和手动比浊法的回收率范围(以百分比表示)分别为89.5 - 102.0、91.2 - 97.0和91.4 - 96.0。平均回收率分别为96.3%、93.4%和93.6%。平均相对标准偏差值分别为5.7、6.3和7.2。比浊法与AOAC法之间几乎没有显著差异;然而,比浊法速度更快。