• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Functional Status Index: reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument.

作者信息

Jette A M

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Sep;61(9):395-401.

PMID:7416929
Abstract

The reliability of 3 methods of assessing respondents' perceptions of their functional ability was tested. The Functional Status Index defines function as including 3 distinct but related dimensions: the degree of dependence, the degree of difficulty and the amount of pain experienced in performing specific activities of daily living. A total of 149 adults with rheumatoid arthritis were studied. Exploratory factor analyses of scores on 18 specific daily activities across the 3 hypothesized dimensions yielded the following functional categories: gross mobility, hand activities, personal care, home chores and interpersonal activities. The resultant indexes achieve internal consistency reliability levels ranging from 0.66 to 0.91 across all but 1 functional category. Average test-retest and interobserver reliability values range from 0.65 to 0.81. Levels of interobserver reliability generally equal or surpass levels of test-retest reliability. The findings suggest that it is feasible to quantify level of function using self-report methods. The Functional Status Index is recommended for use in investigations where changes in functional ability are of interest.

摘要

相似文献

1
Functional Status Index: reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Sep;61(9):395-401.
2
Validity and reliability of the instrument Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living (PS-ADL) and its clinical applicability to adults with rheumatoid arthritis.日常生活活动表现与满意度量表(PS-ADL)的有效性、可靠性及其在类风湿性关节炎成人患者中的临床适用性。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2008 Mar;15(1):13-22. doi: 10.1080/11038120701223165.
3
The Juvenile Arthritis Functional Status Index (JASI): a validation study.青少年关节炎功能状态指数(JASI):一项验证研究。
J Rheumatol. 1996 Jun;23(6):1066-79.
4
Development and testing of the Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ).肺功能状态与呼吸困难问卷(PFSDQ)的开发与测试。
Heart Lung. 1994 May-Jun;23(3):242-50.
5
[Reliability and validition of the Slovak modified version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire using the functional disability index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].[使用功能残疾指数对类风湿性关节炎患者进行斯坦福健康评估问卷斯洛伐克语修订版的可靠性和有效性研究]
Vnitr Lek. 2002 Jan;48(1):8-16.
6
Reliability and validity of a self-report of hand function in persons with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者手部功能自我报告的信度和效度
J Hand Ther. 2006 Jan-Mar;19(1):12-6, quiz 17. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.001.
7
Robinson Bashall Functional Assessment for arthritis patients: reliability and validity.罗宾逊·巴沙尔关节炎患者功能评估:信度与效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Aug;68(8):486-9.
8
Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.通过邮寄问卷测量慢性下腰痛患者自我报告的功能状态和疼痛:一项可靠性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):828-33.
9
Development of an instrument to measure pain in rheumatoid arthritis: Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS).一种用于测量类风湿性关节炎疼痛的工具的开发:类风湿性关节炎疼痛量表(RAPS)。
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;45(4):317-23. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<317::AID-ART343>3.0.CO;2-X.
10
Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma).杜罗兹手部指数在系统性硬化症(硬皮病)患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct 15;51(5):805-9. doi: 10.1002/art.20701.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustained IL-6 and sTNF-αR1 levels after hip fracture predict 5-year mortality: A prospective cohort study from the Baltimore Hip Studies.髋部骨折后持续的白细胞介素 6 和可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体 1 水平可预测 5 年死亡率:来自巴尔的摩髋部研究的前瞻性队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep;72(9):2644-2655. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19018. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Using Objective and Subjective Measures of Cognition to Predict Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Abilities in Multiple Sclerosis.运用认知的客观和主观测量方法预测多发性硬化症患者的日常生活工具性能力
Int J MS Care. 2024 May-Jun;26(3):113-118. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2023-023. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Associations between living alone, social interactions, and physical performance differ by sex: Results from the Baltimore Hip Studies.
独居、社交互动与身体机能表现之间的关联因性别而异:来自巴尔的摩臀部研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Sep;71(9):2788-2797. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18403. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Long-term sex differences in all-cause and infection-specific mortality post hip fracture.髋部骨折后全因和感染特异性死亡率的长期性别差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jul;70(7):2107-2114. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17800. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Sex Differences in Recovery Across Multiple Domains Among Older Adults With Hip Fracture.老年人髋部骨折后多个领域的恢复存在性别差异。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jul 5;77(7):1463-1471. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab271.
6
Biomarkers Associated with Physical Resilience After Hip Fracture.与髋部骨折后身体复原力相关的生物标志物。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Sep 25;75(10):e166-e172. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa119.
7
Genotype, resilience and function and physical activity post hip fracture.基因型、恢复力以及髋部骨折后的功能与身体活动
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2019 Aug;34:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
8
The Relationship Between Alcohol Consumption and Hip Fracture Recovery Among Older Adults.饮酒与老年人髋部骨折康复之间的关系。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Sep;39(9):1046-1051. doi: 10.1177/0733464819845802. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
9
Impact of the on the Health and Health Behaviors of Staff Supporting Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.(原文中“of the”后面缺少具体内容,暂按字面意思翻译)关于支持智力和发育障碍成年人的工作人员的健康及健康行为的影响。
Workplace Health Saf. 2019 Aug;67(8):423-435. doi: 10.1177/2165079919828739. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
10
Residual Disability, Mortality, and Nursing Home Placement After Hip Fracture Over 2 Decades.髋部骨折后 20 多年的残留残疾、死亡率和养老院安置情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May;100(5):874-882. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 2.