Suppr超能文献

鲎试剂检测法与家兔热原检测法的比较

[Comparison of the Limulus test with the pyrogen test in rabbits].

作者信息

Richter K, Grahlow W D, Wigert R

出版信息

Acta Biol Med Ger. 1980;39(2-3):277-80.

PMID:7424347
Abstract

The Limulus test was compared with the official pyrogen test in rabbits for detecting pyrogens in medical devices for single use. 46 samples were examined. Two of them were positive in the rabbit test and also in the Limulus test; 5 samples were only positive in the Limulus test. This is in agreement with published papers. Against endotoxins of gram-negative bacteria the Limulus test is more sensitive than the common test in rabbits, but not sensitive for other pyrogens. Therefore, the Limulus test cannot replace the official rabbit test in the quality control of medical devices. We recommend the Limulus test as a quick, simple and highly sensitive screening method for gram-negative bacterial endotoxins, the most common pyrogen contaminants in drugs.

摘要

将鲎试剂检测法与家兔法定热原检测法进行比较,以检测一次性使用医疗器械中的热原。共检测了46个样品。其中2个在家兔检测和鲎试剂检测中均呈阳性;5个仅在鲎试剂检测中呈阳性。这与已发表的论文一致。对于革兰氏阴性菌的内毒素,鲎试剂检测法比普通的家兔检测法更敏感,但对其他热原不敏感。因此,在医疗器械的质量控制中,鲎试剂检测法不能取代法定的家兔检测法。我们推荐鲎试剂检测法作为一种快速、简单且高度灵敏的革兰氏阴性菌内毒素筛查方法,内毒素是药物中最常见的热原污染物。

相似文献

8
Pyrogen testing of an intravenous fat emulsion.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1979;29:333-7.
9
Views on the reliability of the Limulus test.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1979;29:507-12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验