Ronneberger H J
Dev Biol Stand. 1977;34:27-36.
In the past years an assortment of samples of plasma proteins, enzymes, vaccines and blood substitutes were tested comparatively in rabbits (pyrogen test, European Pharmacopoeia) and with the LAL test (Pyrogent, Byk-Mallinckrodt, Inc.). Specificity and sensitivity were tested with endotoxins and lipid A of gram-negative bacteria. The limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test gave similar results or was tenfold more sensitive than the assay in rabbits. More than 300 samples of drugs were examined by both tests. All preparations positive in the rabbit test were positive in the LAL test too. In the testing of plasma proteins the LAL test was more sensitive. The examination of 45 samples of vaccines for pyrogens gave the same result in both assays. Streptokinase does not inhibit the LAL test unspecifically. The LAL test is not an alternative but an additional method in the detection of lipopolysaccharides in drugs.
在过去几年中,对血浆蛋白、酶、疫苗和血液替代品等各类样品,分别采用家兔热原试验(欧洲药典)和鲎试剂试验(Pyrogent,拜耳 - 马林克罗特公司)进行了比较检测。使用革兰氏阴性菌的内毒素和脂多糖检测了两种方法的特异性和灵敏度。鲎试剂(LAL)试验结果与之相似,或比家兔试验灵敏度高10倍。两种试验检测了300多个药品样品。所有在家兔试验中呈阳性的制剂,在鲎试剂试验中也呈阳性。检测血浆蛋白时,鲎试剂试验更灵敏。对45个疫苗样品进行热原检测,两种试验结果相同。链激酶不会非特异性抑制鲎试剂试验。鲎试剂试验并非药物中脂多糖检测的替代方法,而是一种补充方法。