Suppr超能文献

家兔热原试验与鲎试剂热原试验的比较。

Comparison of the pyrogen tests in rabbits and with limulus lysate.

作者信息

Ronneberger H J

出版信息

Dev Biol Stand. 1977;34:27-36.

PMID:838147
Abstract

In the past years an assortment of samples of plasma proteins, enzymes, vaccines and blood substitutes were tested comparatively in rabbits (pyrogen test, European Pharmacopoeia) and with the LAL test (Pyrogent, Byk-Mallinckrodt, Inc.). Specificity and sensitivity were tested with endotoxins and lipid A of gram-negative bacteria. The limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test gave similar results or was tenfold more sensitive than the assay in rabbits. More than 300 samples of drugs were examined by both tests. All preparations positive in the rabbit test were positive in the LAL test too. In the testing of plasma proteins the LAL test was more sensitive. The examination of 45 samples of vaccines for pyrogens gave the same result in both assays. Streptokinase does not inhibit the LAL test unspecifically. The LAL test is not an alternative but an additional method in the detection of lipopolysaccharides in drugs.

摘要

在过去几年中,对血浆蛋白、酶、疫苗和血液替代品等各类样品,分别采用家兔热原试验(欧洲药典)和鲎试剂试验(Pyrogent,拜耳 - 马林克罗特公司)进行了比较检测。使用革兰氏阴性菌的内毒素和脂多糖检测了两种方法的特异性和灵敏度。鲎试剂(LAL)试验结果与之相似,或比家兔试验灵敏度高10倍。两种试验检测了300多个药品样品。所有在家兔试验中呈阳性的制剂,在鲎试剂试验中也呈阳性。检测血浆蛋白时,鲎试剂试验更灵敏。对45个疫苗样品进行热原检测,两种试验结果相同。链激酶不会非特异性抑制鲎试剂试验。鲎试剂试验并非药物中脂多糖检测的替代方法,而是一种补充方法。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验