Suppr超能文献

用于检测热原的替代兔生物测定法的测试。

Tests alternative to the rabbit bioassay for pyrogens.

作者信息

Marcus S, Nelson J R

出版信息

Dev Biol Stand. 1977;34:45-55.

PMID:838149
Abstract

The rabbit bioassay is currently the only legally acceptable method to test for pyrogenic contamination of parenteral preparations and medical devices designed to enter the parenterum. However, research efforts have recently made available alternative procedures to test for pyrogens which may have significant value in quality control. Part of the reluctance to accept tests other than the rabbit test may be due to the low visibility of emerging understanding of a significant theory of testing in which it is contended that the parameters of sensitivity and specificity are inversely related and that accuracy is an ideal. The rabbit pyrogen assay will detect 1 to 10 ng of enterobacteriaceal endotoxin (ET). The limulus test will detect 0.01 to 0.1 ng/ml of ET; some of the other tests approach the rabbit assay in sensitivity. Since it is current dogma that pyrogen is equivalent to ET, the basis for the use of ET to standardize pyrogen tests is rationalized. The source of ET in practice is bacterial contamination; therefore, numbers of bacteria that contaminate parenteral preparations can be directly related to potential pyrogenicity. Further, viable counts of bacteria in parenteral preparations, prior to sterilization, is a reliable test for pyrogens. Other tests such as nitroblue tetrazolium reduction and actinomycin-D enhancement of lethality of pyrogen for mice deserve consideration in quality control procedures. The limulus test, the most practical of currently available alternative tests for detection of ET and therefore, of pyrogen has application where the rabbit test cannot be used. Therefore, control personnel must learn of the availability, performance and interpretation of the limulus test. Practical considerations must govern the choice of an alternative test when the use of a test other than the rabbit bioassay is indicated.

摘要

兔热原试验是目前唯一合法认可的用于检测注射用制剂和旨在进入血液循环的医疗器械热原污染的方法。然而,最近的研究努力已提供了检测热原的替代程序,这些程序在质量控制中可能具有重要价值。除兔热原试验外,人们不愿接受其他试验的部分原因可能是,对于一种重要检测理论的新认识鲜为人知,该理论认为敏感性和特异性参数呈负相关,而准确性是一种理想状态。兔热原试验能检测出1至10纳克的肠杆菌科内毒素(ET)。鲎试剂试验能检测出0.01至0.1纳克/毫升的ET;其他一些试验在敏感性上接近兔热原试验。由于目前的教条认为热原等同于ET,所以使用ET来标准化热原试验的依据是合理的。实际上,ET的来源是细菌污染;因此,污染注射用制剂的细菌数量可直接与潜在热原性相关。此外,注射用制剂在灭菌前的细菌活菌计数是一种可靠的热原检测方法。其他试验,如硝基蓝四氮唑还原试验以及放线菌素D增强热原对小鼠致死性的试验,在质量控制程序中值得考虑。鲎试剂试验是目前检测ET从而检测热原的替代试验中最实用的一种,在无法使用兔热原试验的情况下有应用价值。因此,质量控制人员必须了解鲎试剂试验的可用性、性能及结果解读。当表明要使用除兔热原试验以外的其他试验时,实际考虑因素必须决定替代试验的选择。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验