Suppr超能文献

对六种用于检测人血清中初级胆汁酸的“试剂盒”放射免疫分析方法的结果进行了相互比较。

Results with six "kit" radioimmunoassays for primary bile acids in human serum intercompared.

作者信息

Roda A, Roda E, Aldini R, Capelli M, Festi D, Sama C, Mazzella G, Morselli A M, Barbara L

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1980 Nov;26(12):1677-82.

PMID:7428151
Abstract

We examined six radioimmunoassay procedures for measuring primary bile acids in human serum (two 3H-labeled and four 125I-labeled). A significant (p < 0.01) correlation was observed between measurements in the assay both for cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid, at low and high concentrations of serum bile acids. All kits were acceptable with respect to accuracy, precision, stability, and analytical recovery. All six procedures gave similar results for chenodeoxycholic and cholic acid in sera of 80 healthy subjects; the agreement was also close when the two primary bile acids were compared with their sum in serum. Normal values ranged from 0.4 to 2.5 mumol/L for conjugated chenodeoxycholic acid and from 0.3 to 1.5 mumol/L for conjugated cholic acid. The 125I assays do not require liquid-scintillation equipment but 125I induces a decrease in the affinity constant of antibody. The sensitivity of the assays was still adequate for measuring bile acids in the serum of healthy fasting persons and liver-disease patients.

摘要

我们检测了六种用于测量人血清中初级胆汁酸的放射免疫分析方法(两种³H标记的和四种¹²⁵I标记的)。在低浓度和高浓度血清胆汁酸情况下,胆酸和鹅去氧胆酸的分析测量结果之间均观察到显著相关性(p < 0.01)。就准确性、精密度、稳定性和分析回收率而言,所有试剂盒均合格。对于80名健康受试者血清中的鹅去氧胆酸和胆酸,所有六种方法给出的结果相似;当将这两种初级胆汁酸与其血清中的总和进行比较时,一致性也很接近。结合型鹅去氧胆酸的正常值范围为0.4至2.5 μmol/L,结合型胆酸的正常值范围为0.3至1.5 μmol/L。¹²⁵I分析方法不需要液体闪烁设备,但¹²⁵I会导致抗体亲和常数降低。这些分析方法的灵敏度对于测量健康空腹者和肝病患者血清中的胆汁酸仍然足够。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验