• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.

作者信息

Farkas G M, Sine L F, Evans I M

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 1978 Nov;7(6):513-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01541919.

DOI:10.1007/BF01541919
PMID:742962
Abstract

Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences were examined in volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual arousal. Subjects were 108 participants in a questionnaire study entitled "Personality and Sexuality", who were then asked to volunteer for a second study which necessitated watching sexually explicit films, being partially undressed in an experimental chamber, and having penile diameter measured via a strain gauge device. Volunteers for the second study were found to be less guilty, less sexually fearful, more sexually experienced, and older than nonvolunteers. Volunteers also reported a higher incidence of past erectile difficulties and tended to be White or of mixed racial heritage, as opposed to being Oriental. Other personality variables did not discriminate between the two groups. The results indicate that future research in human sexuality using the laboratory analytic method must impose strict limits on generalization from the research data.

摘要

相似文献

1
Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.
Arch Sex Behav. 1978 Nov;7(6):513-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01541919.
2
Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males.人类性行为研究中的志愿者偏差:男性在性行为和个性方面存在差异的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 1996 Apr;25(2):125-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02437932.
3
Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal.
Arch Sex Behav. 1983 Oct;12(5):399-408. doi: 10.1007/BF01542883.
4
Volunteer bias in erotica research: effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.
Arch Sex Behav. 1985 Apr;14(2):93-107. doi: 10.1007/BF01541656.
5
Volunteer bias in sexuality research.性取向研究中的志愿者偏差。
Arch Sex Behav. 1995 Aug;24(4):369-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01541853.
6
Volunteer bias, sexuality, and personality.志愿者偏差、性取向与个性。
Arch Sex Behav. 1998 Apr;27(2):181-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1018634614590.
7
Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: the female experience of men's attitudes to life events and sexuality (FEMALES) study.勃起功能障碍男性伴侣的性体验:男性对生活事件和性行为态度的女性体验(FEMALES)研究
J Sex Med. 2005 Sep;2(5):675-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00118.x.
8
Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior.一项关于男性酗酒者性行为研究中的志愿者偏差。
Arch Sex Behav. 1991 Aug;20(4):371-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01542617.
9
Seventeen-year review of sexual and contraceptive behavior on a college campus.大学校园性与避孕行为的十七年回顾
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 1):1833-7; discussion 1837-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90698-i.
10
Alcohol consumption, female sexual behavior and contraceptive use.饮酒、女性性行为与避孕措施的使用。
J Stud Alcohol. 1986 Jul;47(4):327-32. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1986.47.327.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Participation for Sexuality Items in a U.S. Population-Based Online Survey.参与美国基于人群的在线调查中性行为项目的预测因素。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1743-1752. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02533-6. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
No decline in semen quality among potential sperm donors in Sydney, Australia, between 1983 and 2001.1983年至2001年间,澳大利亚悉尼潜在精子捐献者的精液质量没有下降。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Jun;19(6):284-90. doi: 10.1023/a:1015729314081.
3
Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males.

本文引用的文献

1
Volunteer-error in the Kinsey study.金赛研究中的志愿者误差。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1952 Apr;47(2):259-62. doi: 10.1037/h0054411.
2
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.一种独立于精神病理学的新的社会期望量表。
J Consult Psychol. 1960 Aug;24:349-54. doi: 10.1037/h0047358.
3
Characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers in psychological experimentation.心理实验中志愿者与非志愿者的特征。
人类性行为研究中的志愿者偏差:男性在性行为和个性方面存在差异的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 1996 Apr;25(2):125-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02437932.
4
The effect of question preface on response rates to a telephone survey of sexual experience.问题前言对性经历电话调查应答率的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 1994 Apr;23(2):203-15. doi: 10.1007/BF01542099.
5
Volunteer bias in sexuality research.性取向研究中的志愿者偏差。
Arch Sex Behav. 1995 Aug;24(4):369-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01541853.
6
Sexual experience, birth control usage, and sex education of unmarried Canadian university students: changes between 1968 and 1978.加拿大未婚大学生的性经历、节育措施使用情况及性教育:1968年至1978年间的变化
Arch Sex Behav. 1980 Oct;9(5):367-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02115939.
7
Effects of demand for performance, self-monitoring of arousal, and increased sympathetic nervous system activity on male erectile response.对表现的需求、唤醒的自我监测以及交感神经系统活动增加对男性勃起反应的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 1981 Oct;10(5):443-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01541436.
8
Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal.
Arch Sex Behav. 1983 Oct;12(5):399-408. doi: 10.1007/BF01542883.
9
The role of anxiety in sexual dysfunctions: a review.焦虑在性功能障碍中的作用:综述
Arch Sex Behav. 1984 Apr;13(2):165-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01542150.
10
Volunteer bias in erotica research: effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.
Arch Sex Behav. 1985 Apr;14(2):93-107. doi: 10.1007/BF01541656.
J Consult Psychol. 1958 Dec;22(6):475-9. doi: 10.1037/h0041496.
4
Responses to a personality questionnaire by volunteers and non-volunteers to a Kinsey interview.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1956 Mar;52(2):280-1. doi: 10.1037/h0047875.
5
Sexual behavior in the human male. 1948.人类男性的性行为。1948年。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jun;93(6):894-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.6.894.
6
The measurement of psychoticism: a study of factor stability and reliability.精神质的测量:一项关于因素稳定性和可靠性的研究。
Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1968 Dec;7(4):286-94. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00571.x.
7
Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.
Arch Sex Behav. 1975 Mar;4(2):161-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01541080.