Miller R D, Offord K P
Mayo Clin Proc. 1980 Nov;55(11):694-9.
Geometric analysis of the chest roentgenogram allows calculation of estimated gas volume. If roentgenograms are made on individual patients or in epidemiologic studies in which relatively expensive nitrogen meters or body plethysmographs are not available, the thoracic roentgenogram provides an economical alternative. This study compares two roentgenographic methods of estimating total lung capacity in 154 subjects who also had total lung capacity estimated by the 7-minute nitrogen-washout technique or by total-body plethysmography. Results with the roentgenographic techniques were closely comparable with each other and with those of the gas-dilution and total-body plethysmograph methods in normal subjects. The planimetric method consistently estimated higher total lung capacity than the elliptic method in men and women with total lung capacity of 7.75 liters or less. In patients with severe obstructive lung disease, the roentgenographic methods were more closely comparable with body plethysmography, which is believed to be the most accurate, whereas the nitrogen-rinsing and similar gas-dilutional methods tended to underestimate the true volumes. The roentgenographic techniques also proved to be reliable in a small group of patients with varying degrees of pulmonary fibrosis.
胸部X线片的几何分析可用于计算估计的气体量。如果对个体患者进行X线检查,或在流行病学研究中无法使用相对昂贵的氮测定仪或体容积描记器时,胸部X线片提供了一种经济的替代方法。本研究比较了两种X线摄影方法在154名受试者中估计肺总量的情况,这些受试者同时也通过7分钟氮洗脱技术或全身容积描记法估计了肺总量。在正常受试者中,X线摄影技术的结果彼此之间以及与气体稀释法和全身容积描记法的结果密切可比。在肺总量为7.75升或更低的男性和女性中,面积测量法始终比椭圆法估计的肺总量更高。在患有严重阻塞性肺病的患者中,X线摄影方法与被认为是最准确的体容积描记法更具可比性,而氮冲洗及类似的气体稀释法往往低估了真实容积。X线摄影技术在一小群患有不同程度肺纤维化的患者中也被证明是可靠的。