Paré P D, Wiggs B J, Coppin C A
Thorax. 1983 Jun;38(6):468-71. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.6.468.
The standard plethysmographic method of measuring total lung capacity (TLC) has been reported to result in spuriously high estimates in patients with severe airway obstruction. The helium-dilution method is known to underestimate TLC in the same patients. To determine the magnitude of these possible errors we measured TLC by four methods in 20 patients with varying degrees of chronic obstructive lung disease and in 11 normal subjects. TLC was measured by (1) helium dilution (TLCHe); (2) a volume-displacement body plethysmograph, box volume being plotted against mouth pressure (TLCm); (3) the same body plethysmograph with volume plotted against pressure measured with an oesophageal balloon (TLCes); and (4) a radiological technique (TLCxr). In normal subjects there was no difference between TCLm (6.57 +/- 1.20) and TLCes (6.51 +/- 1.24). In the patients with chronic obstructive lung disease TLCm gave results significantly higher than those of any other method. If TLCes is taken as the closest estimate of true TLC, TLCm consistently overestimates and TLCHe underestimates TLC. There was no relationship between the degree of airway obstruction and (TLCm - TLCes) but there was between (TLCes - TLCHe) and severity of airway obstruction. We conclude that using mouth pressure in the plethysmographic measurement of TLC in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease results in consistent but slight overestimation of TLC.
据报道,测量肺总量(TLC)的标准体积描记法在严重气道阻塞患者中会导致过高的估计值。已知氦稀释法在同一患者中会低估TLC。为了确定这些可能误差的大小,我们用四种方法对20例不同程度的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和11名正常受试者进行了TLC测量。TLC的测量方法如下:(1)氦稀释法(TLCHe);(2)容积置换式体容积描记仪,将箱内容积与口腔压力作图(TLCm);(3)同一台体容积描记仪,将容积与用食管气囊测量的压力作图(TLCes);(4)放射学技术(TLCxr)。在正常受试者中,TCLm(6.57±1.20)和TLCes(6.51±1.24)之间没有差异。在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,TLCm得出的结果显著高于其他任何方法。如果将TLCes视为最接近真实TLC的估计值,TLCm始终高估TLC,而TLCHe则低估TLC。气道阻塞程度与(TLCm - TLCes)之间没有关系,但(TLCes - TLCHe)与气道阻塞严重程度之间有关系。我们得出结论,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,使用口腔压力进行TLC的体积描记测量会导致对TLC的一致但轻微的高估。