Suppr超能文献

腹腔内压力:腹水与内脏血管压力及其在腹水预防和形成中的作用。

Intraperitoneal pressure: ascitic fluid and splanchnic vascular pressures, and their role in prevention and formation of ascites.

作者信息

Henriksen J H, Stage J G, Schlichting P, Winkler K

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1980 Oct;40(6):493-501. doi: 10.3109/00365518009091956.

Abstract

Seventeen patients with ascites due to cirrhosis underwent hepatic venous catheterization and pressure measurement in the ascitic fluid. Intraperitoneal fluid hydrostatic pressure (IFP) ranged 3.5-22, mean 11.2 mm Hg, and correlated closely to the pressure in the inferior vena cava (r = 0.97, P < 0.001), which was on average 1.8 mmHg above that of ascitic fluid (P < 0.005). Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) (range 19-43, mean 32 mmHg) correlated directly to IFP (0.89, P < 0.001) and was significantly higher than that of ten cirrhotic patients without ascites (range 12-27, mean 20 mmHg, P < 0.005). After diuretic therapy WHVP decreased to an average of 20 mmHg. Mean plasma colloid osmotic pressures were 20 mmHg (range 18-24 mmHg)( and 23 mmHg (range 19-29 mmHg) in patients with and without ascites, the values being significantly different (P < 0.05). Colloid osmotic pressure of ascitic fluid ranged 1-14, mean 4.9 mmHg. Mean ratio between albumin concentration in ascitic fluid and plasma was 0.31 (range 0.12-0.77). In five pigs portal venous pressure (PVP) increased during infusion of fluid into the peritoneal cavity. The increase in PVP was smaller than that of IFP (P < 0.02), indicating that ascitic fluid stems the pressures in the splanchnic venous vascular bed up to a higher level, but that the transmural hydrostatic pressure difference decreases simultaneously. The results are discussed in relation to the local 'oedema-preventing' mechanisms: (a) increased interstitial hydrostatic fluid pressure, (b) decreased interstitial fluid colloid osmotic pressure, (c) increased lymph flow, and it is concluded that the peritoneal space can be considered as a special part of the interstitium in which IFP is considered to play an important role in regulation of ascitic fluid.

摘要

17例肝硬化腹水患者接受了肝静脉插管及腹水压力测量。腹腔内液体静水压(IFP)范围为3.5 - 22,平均为11.2 mmHg,与下腔静脉压力密切相关(r = 0.97,P < 0.001),下腔静脉压力平均比腹水压力高1.8 mmHg(P < 0.005)。肝静脉楔压(WHVP)(范围19 - 43,平均32 mmHg)与IFP直接相关(0.89,P < 0.001),且显著高于10例无腹水的肝硬化患者(范围12 - 27,平均20 mmHg,P < 0.005)。利尿治疗后,WHVP平均降至20 mmHg。有腹水和无腹水患者的平均血浆胶体渗透压分别为20 mmHg(范围18 - 24 mmHg)和23 mmHg(范围19 - 29 mmHg),两者差异显著(P < 0.05)。腹水胶体渗透压范围为1 - 14,平均为4.9 mmHg。腹水与血浆中白蛋白浓度的平均比值为0.31(范围0.12 - 0.77)。在5头猪中,向腹腔内输注液体期间门静脉压力(PVP)升高。PVP的升高幅度小于IFP(P < 0.02),表明腹水可使内脏静脉血管床压力升高至更高水平,但跨壁静水压差同时减小。结合局部“防止水肿”机制(a. 间质静水压升高;b. 间质液胶体渗透压降低;c. 淋巴液流量增加)对结果进行了讨论,得出结论:腹膜腔可被视为间质的一个特殊部分,其中IFP在腹水调节中起重要作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验