• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一家县级医院肠胃外头孢菌素的使用、滥用及成本情况

Use, misuse, and cost of parenteral cephalosporins at a county hospital.

作者信息

Appleby D H, John J F

出版信息

South Med J. 1980 Nov;73(11):1473-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198011000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00007611-198011000-00016
PMID:7444511
Abstract

We reviewed total usage of parenteral cephalosporins at a county hospital during 1978 with regard to appropriateness, pattern of use, and cost. In addition, we determined the impact of replacing cephalothin with cephapirin in the hospital formulary. During the 12-month study 366 patients received 409 courses of parenteral cephalosporins: 167 received cefazolin, 160 received cephapirin, and 35 received a combination of cefazolin and cephapirin. The surgical service prescribed 87% of the cephapirin and 92% of the cefazolin. Parenteral cephalosporins were used 62% of the time for prophylaxis and 38% of the time for therapy. Usage was judged inappropriate in 47% of all courses based on our criteria; 25% of the therapeutic courses were judged inappropriate, compared to 60% of the prophylactic courses. Pharmacy costs of cefazolin used as prophylaxis were more than twice the cost for cephapirin. Cost of a mean therapeutic course for cefazolin was 43% higher than for cephapirin. Antibiotic audits and continued education combined with judicial substitution of therapeutic equivalents should limit the inappropriate use and expense of parenteral cephalosporins for large as well as small hospitals.

摘要

我们回顾了1978年一家县医院肠胃外头孢菌素的总体使用情况,涉及适用性、使用模式和成本。此外,我们还确定了在医院配方中用头孢匹林替代头孢噻吩的影响。在为期12个月的研究中,366名患者接受了409个疗程的肠胃外头孢菌素治疗:167人接受头孢唑林,160人接受头孢匹林,35人接受头孢唑林和头孢匹林的联合治疗。外科服务部门开出了87%的头孢匹林和92%的头孢唑林。肠胃外头孢菌素62%的时间用于预防,38%的时间用于治疗。根据我们的标准,47%的疗程使用不当;25%的治疗疗程被判定为不当,而预防疗程的这一比例为60%。用作预防的头孢唑林的药房成本是头孢匹林的两倍多。头孢唑林平均治疗疗程的成本比头孢匹林高43%。抗生素审计和持续教育,再加上合理替换治疗等效物,应能限制大医院和小医院肠胃外头孢菌素的不当使用和费用。

相似文献

1
Use, misuse, and cost of parenteral cephalosporins at a county hospital.一家县级医院肠胃外头孢菌素的使用、滥用及成本情况
South Med J. 1980 Nov;73(11):1473-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198011000-00016.
2
Savings achieved through cephalosporin surveillance.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978 Dec;35(12):1521-3.
3
Comparative costs of two cephalosporins, cefazolin and cephalothin.两种头孢菌素(头孢唑林和头孢噻吩)的成本比较
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1976 Nov;10(11):655. doi: 10.1177/106002807601001116.
4
[Surveillance of cephalosporins therapy in therapeutic practice of 15 Italian hospitals (author's transl)].[15家意大利医院治疗实践中头孢菌素治疗的监测(作者译)]
Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1979 Jun;15 Suppl 1:406-18.
5
Phlebitis associated with the intravenous use of cephapirin and cephalothin in the combination therapy of antibiotics.在抗生素联合治疗中,静脉使用头孢匹林和头孢噻吩相关的静脉炎。
Jpn J Antibiot. 1980 Nov;33(11):1163-5.
6
Pharmacy and therapeutics committee review of the parenteral cephalosporins.药学与治疗学委员会对胃肠外头孢菌素的审查。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978 Jan;35(1):73-5.
7
Comparison of thrombophlebitis associated with three cephalosporin antibiotics.三种头孢菌素类抗生素相关血栓性静脉炎的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Sep;10(3):467-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.3.467.
8
Comparative pharmacokinetic studies of cephapirin and cephalothin following intravenous and intramuscular administration.头孢匹林和头孢噻吩静脉注射及肌肉注射后的比较药代动力学研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 1977 Jan;21(1):117-27.
9
Comparison of absorption and excretion of cefazolin with cephalothin and cephapirin.头孢唑林与头孢噻吩和头孢匹林的吸收及排泄比较。
Jpn J Antibiot. 1975 Aug;28(4):542-8.
10
Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefamandole, cephapirin, and cephalothin in healthy subjects and effect of repeated dosing.头孢孟多、头孢匹林和头孢噻吩在健康受试者中的比较药代动力学及重复给药的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Sep;10(3):421-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.3.421.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a computerized provider order entry and a clinical decision support system to improve cefazolin use in surgical prophylaxis: a cost saving analysis.计算机化医嘱录入系统和临床决策支持系统对改善头孢唑林在外科预防用药中使用情况的效果:一项成本节约分析
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Jul-Sep;14(3):717. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.03.717. Epub 2016 Sep 15.