• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孵化温度和采样部位对商业屠宰场红肉胴体细菌数量评估的影响。

The effect of incubation temperature and site of sampling on assessment of the numbers of bacteria on red meat carcasses at commercial abattoirs.

作者信息

Roberts T A, MacFie H J, Hudson W R

出版信息

J Hyg (Lond). 1980 Dec;85(3):371-80. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063440.

DOI:10.1017/s0022172400063440
PMID:7462589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2134014/
Abstract

Several sites on commercial beef, pork and lamb carcasses were sampled at the end of the slaughterline. Total viable counts (TVC) of bacteria were assessed by incubation at 37, 20 and 1 degree C in addition to presumptive coliforms (PC), Enterobacteriaceae (ENT) and faecal streptococci (FS). Statistical analyses showed consistently dirty sites within an abattoir but these sites varied from one abattoir to another. Inter-site differences were unaffected by the incubation temperature of the TVC. Numbers of PC, ENT and FS did not mimic TVC. Empirical sampling plans are proposed to detect the highest count on a carcass by bulking samples from known dirty sites. At the end of the slaughterline TVC 37 degrees C is the most useful bacteriological index.

摘要

在屠宰线末端对商业牛肉、猪肉和羊肉胴体的多个部位进行了采样。除了对推定大肠菌群(PC)、肠杆菌科(ENT)和粪链球菌(FS)进行检测外,还通过在37℃、20℃和1℃下培养来评估细菌的总活菌数(TVC)。统计分析表明,屠宰场内存在始终脏污的部位,但这些部位在不同屠宰场之间有所不同。TVC的培养温度对不同部位之间的差异没有影响。PC、ENT和FS的数量与TVC并不相似。建议采用经验性采样计划,通过将来自已知脏污部位的样本合并来检测胴体上的最高菌数。在屠宰线末端,37℃时的TVC是最有用的细菌学指标。

相似文献

1
The effect of incubation temperature and site of sampling on assessment of the numbers of bacteria on red meat carcasses at commercial abattoirs.孵化温度和采样部位对商业屠宰场红肉胴体细菌数量评估的影响。
J Hyg (Lond). 1980 Dec;85(3):371-80. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063440.
2
Bacteriological status of beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir before and after slaughterline improvements.商业屠宰场屠宰线改进前后牛肉胴体的细菌学状况
Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Feb;98(1):81-6. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061732.
3
The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain.清洁动物和肮脏动物对牛肉链中细菌动态的意义。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Dec 2;214:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
4
A minimal apparatus method for counting bacteria: comparison with reference method in surveying beef carcasses at three commercial abattoirs.一种用于细菌计数的简易仪器法:与在三家商业屠宰场检测牛胴体时的参考方法的比较
J Hyg (Lond). 1983 Dec;91(3):459-66. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400060502.
5
The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir.一家商业屠宰场中牛皮清洁度与牛 carcasses 上细菌数量之间的关系。 (注:这里carcasses常见释义为“屠体” )
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000 May;30(5):390-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00739.x.
6
Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.两家屠宰场中牛胴体在不同屠宰阶段的微生物污染情况。
Meat Sci. 2014 Oct;98(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
7
Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.实现符合2001/471/EC及新卫生法规要求的微生物胴体采样方法。
Res Microbiol. 2005 Jan-Feb;156(1):104-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.08.007.
8
Comparison of aerial counts at different sites in beef and sheep abattoirs and the relationship between aerial and beef carcass contamination.比较不同地点在牛和羊屠宰场的空中计数和空中与牛肉胴体污染之间的关系。
Food Microbiol. 2012 Dec;32(2):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
9
Microbiological quality of chilled beef carcasses in Northern Ireland: a baseline survey.北爱尔兰冷藏牛肉胴体的微生物质量:一项基线调查。
J Food Prot. 2001 Apr;64(4):498-502. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.4.498.
10
Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.猪胴体的微生物采样:瑞典屠宰场用医用纱布擦拭获得的数据与常规切除采集的数据比较
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep 15;118(2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiological contamination of reindeer carcass during slaughter.驯鹿屠宰过程中鹿 carcass 的微生物污染。 注:这里“carcass”常见释义为“(屠宰后待加工的)畜体、兽体” ,结合语境这里应该是指驯鹿屠宰后的躯体。因不太明确你提供的原文中该词是否准确,你可根据实际情况调整。
Acta Vet Scand. 1994;35(4):383-8. doi: 10.1186/BF03548312.
2
A survey of the hygienic quality of beef and pork carcasses in Norway.挪威牛肉和猪肉胴体卫生质量调查。
Acta Vet Scand. 1983;24(1):1-13. doi: 10.1186/BF03546753.
3
A minimal apparatus method for counting bacteria: comparison with reference method in surveying beef carcasses at three commercial abattoirs.一种用于细菌计数的简易仪器法:与在三家商业屠宰场检测牛胴体时的参考方法的比较
J Hyg (Lond). 1983 Dec;91(3):459-66. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400060502.
4
Microbiology of beef carcasses before and after slaughterline automation.屠宰线自动化前后牛肉胴体的微生物学
J Hyg (Lond). 1986 Apr;96(2):205-16. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400065979.
5
Bacteriological status of beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir before and after slaughterline improvements.商业屠宰场屠宰线改进前后牛肉胴体的细菌学状况
Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Feb;98(1):81-6. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061732.
6
Bacterial populations on dressed pig carcasses.处理过的猪胴体上的细菌种群。
Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Feb;98(1):15-24. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061677.

本文引用的文献

1
The microbiology of the red meat carcass and the slaughterhouse.红肉胴体及屠宰场的微生物学
R Soc Health J. 1976 Dec;96(6):270-6.