• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[诊断程序的评估。关于经典指标的一些评论(作者译)]

[Assessment of diagnostic procedures. Some comments about classical indices (author's transl)].

作者信息

Poynard T, Alperovitch A

出版信息

J Radiol. 1980 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):551-6.

PMID:7463401
Abstract

The assessment of diagnostic technologies, concerns today both clinicians and health care administrators. This assessment is based upon calculation of various indices measuring the informative value of diagnostic test: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive value. Despite their extreme semplicity, these indices can be misinterpreted and misused; in addition they are often calculated from very particular patients sample, especially when retrospective data are used. The main points which influence the value confered to a diagnostic test, the major bias to avoid designing such studies are pointed out this paper. The likeness between controlled therapeutic trial and comparative assessment of diagnostic technologies is particularly emphasized.

摘要

如今,诊断技术的评估受到临床医生和医疗保健管理人员的关注。这种评估基于对各种衡量诊断测试信息价值的指标的计算:敏感性、特异性、准确性、预测价值。尽管这些指标极其简单,但仍可能被误解和误用;此外,它们往往是根据非常特殊的患者样本计算得出的,尤其是在使用回顾性数据时。本文指出了影响赋予诊断测试价值的要点,以及在设计此类研究时要避免的主要偏差。特别强调了对照治疗试验与诊断技术比较评估之间的相似性。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of diagnostic procedures. Some comments about classical indices (author's transl)].[诊断程序的评估。关于经典指标的一些评论(作者译)]
J Radiol. 1980 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):551-6.
2
A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.一种基于症状的精细化方法用于诊断儿童肺结核。
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1350-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0519.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Evaluation of new diagnostic technologies: bronchoalveolar lavage and the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.新诊断技术的评估:支气管肺泡灌洗与呼吸机相关性肺炎的诊断
Crit Care Med. 1994 Aug;22(8):1314-22.
6
[Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].[一项检测的诊断价值评估。主要信息指标]
J Radiol. 1995 Feb-Mar;76(2-3):I-X.
7
Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.加权2×2kappa系数:循证医学实践中推荐的诊断准确性指标。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1045-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.QUADOMICS:诊断准确性评估质量评估(QUADAS)的一种改编版本,用于评估基于“组学”技术的诊断准确性研究的方法学质量。
Clin Biochem. 2008 Nov;41(16-17):1316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.06.018. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
9
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第5部分。诊断准确性研究。
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40.
10
[Evaluation of the diagnostic contribution of a test. Main information indices].[一项检测的诊断贡献评估。主要信息指标]
J Radiol. 1994 Feb;75(2):141-50.