Suppr超能文献

兽医从业者的职业责任(作者译)

[Professional liability of veterinary practitioners (author's transl)].

作者信息

Wouda L H

出版信息

Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1981 Jan 1;106(1):25-37.

PMID:7466764
Abstract

There are two spheres of professional liability of veterinary practitioners, in which claims can be made on these practitioners in their quality of insured. These are their liability for services and their liability for products. In both fields the issue is one of the care with which veterinary drugs and vaccines are used in an animal or group of animals respectively. As data on the subject are virtually absent in the literature, experience will have to provide the basis. In jurisdiction in the Netherlands, recourse is frequently had to Section 1401 of the Civil Code where services are concerned. Liability for products is marked by a line adopted by the Council of Ministers of the European Economic Community. It can be concluded that improvement of uniformity in the field in question may be achieved by lengthy discussion. In assessing claims for damages, however, each case will have to be judged on its own merits.

摘要

兽医从业者存在两个职业责任领域,在这些领域中,可针对其作为被保险人的身份向他们提出索赔。这两个领域分别是他们对服务的责任和对产品的责任。在这两个领域中,问题都在于在动物或一组动物中使用兽药和疫苗时的谨慎程度。由于文献中几乎没有关于该主题的数据,因此必须以经验为依据。在荷兰的司法管辖中,涉及服务时经常援引《民法典》第1401条。产品责任则以欧洲经济共同体部长理事会通过的一条规定为标志。可以得出结论,通过长时间的讨论可以在所涉领域实现更高的一致性。然而,在评估损害赔偿索赔时,每个案件都必须根据其自身的是非曲直进行判断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验