Suppr超能文献

猫橄榄耳蜗通路保护作用的频率和损失依赖性

Frequency and loss dependence of the protective effects of the olivocochlear pathways in cats.

作者信息

Rajan R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1995 Aug;74(2):598-615. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.2.598.

Abstract
  1. In the previous manuscript I suggested a frequency dependency to olivocochlear bundle (OCB)-mediated protection from loud sound by showing protection for binaural compared with monaural 11-kHz exposures but not 3-kHz exposures of the same intensity and duration. To determine whether this was the case, experiments were carried out in barbiturate-anesthetized cats using the paradigm of a unilateral brain stem incision to deefferent one cochlea in each animal before presentation of a binaural loud sound exposure. With equal-intensity, equal-duration binaural exposures, in different groups protection in OCB-intact compared with OCB-cut ears was seen only for exposures at 11, 15, or 20 kHz, but not at 3 or 7 kHz, suggesting that OCB-mediated protection was found only for higher-frequency exposures. This would be consistent with the OCB-mediated protection in guinea pig studies where 10-kHz exposures were used and its absence in a study in cats where 6-kHz exposures were used. However, this conclusion had to be qualified by the fact that the lower-frequency exposures resulted in smaller threshold losses than did the higher-frequency exposures. 2. To determine whether OCB-mediated protection could be obtained for lower-frequency exposures that were made as damaging as or more damaging than the high-frequency exposures, longer-duration, lower-frequency exposures were used. OCB-mediated protection could then be obtained for exposure at 7 kHz, 100 dB SPL for 15 min but not at 3 or 5 kHz, 100 dB SPL for 20 min or at 3 kHz, 100 dB SPL for 40 min or 106 dB SPL for 20 min. Finally, when large threshold losses were produced with exposure at 3 kHz, 106 dB SPL for 40 min, OCB-mediated protection could be obtained for this low-frequency exposure too. These effects suggested that there were different "activation threshold" for OCB-mediated protection as a function of exposure frequency. To determine whether this also applied for the higher-frequency exposures (11, 15, and 20 kHz), all of which had elicited OCB-mediated protection when presented at 100 dB SPL for 10 min, these exposure frequencies were presented at 100 dB SPL for 7 min to produce low threshold losses. Now protection was found for the 11- and 15-kHz exposures but not for the 20-kHz exposure. 3. Thus the activation threshold for OCB-mediated protection varied in a frequency-dependent manner.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 在前一篇论文中,我提出橄榄耳蜗束(OCB)介导的对强声的保护存在频率依赖性,通过比较相同强度和时长的双耳与单耳11千赫兹暴露的保护情况,但不包括3千赫兹暴露。为了确定是否如此,在巴比妥麻醉的猫身上进行了实验,采用单侧脑干切开的范式,在每只动物双耳暴露强声之前使一侧耳蜗去传入神经。在等强度、等时长的双耳暴露中,在不同组中,仅在11、15或20千赫兹的暴露中观察到OCB完整耳与OCB切断耳相比有保护作用,而在3或7千赫兹时没有,这表明仅在高频暴露中发现了OCB介导的保护作用。这与豚鼠研究中使用10千赫兹暴露时的OCB介导的保护作用以及猫研究中使用6千赫兹暴露时未发现该作用是一致的。然而,这一结论必须因低频暴露导致的阈值损失比高频暴露小这一事实而有所限定。2. 为了确定对于造成与高频暴露一样大或更大损害的低频暴露是否能获得OCB介导的保护作用,使用了更长时长的低频暴露。然后对于7千赫兹、100分贝声压级暴露15分钟的情况可以获得OCB介导的保护作用,但对于3或5千赫兹、100分贝声压级暴露20分钟,或3千赫兹、100分贝声压级暴露40分钟或106分贝声压级暴露20分钟的情况则不能。最后,当3千赫兹、106分贝声压级暴露40分钟产生较大阈值损失时,对于这种低频暴露也能获得OCB介导的保护作用。这些效应表明,OCB介导的保护作用存在不同的“激活阈值”,它是暴露频率的函数。为了确定这是否也适用于高频暴露(11、15和20千赫兹),当这些频率以100分贝声压级暴露10分钟时都能引发OCB介导的保护作用,现在将这些暴露频率以100分贝声压级暴露7分钟以产生较低的阈值损失。现在发现11千赫兹和15千赫兹的暴露有保护作用,而20千赫兹的暴露没有。3. 因此,OCB介导的保护作用的激活阈值以频率依赖的方式变化。(摘要截断于400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验