Whyte J, Polansky M, Fleming M, Coslett H B, Cavallucci C
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jul;33(7):797-813. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00029-3.
Clinicians report that patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have difficulty with tasks requiring sustained attention, and there are neuroanatomical and neurophysiological reasons to expect such deficits. Nevertheless, laboratory measures of sustained attention or vigilance in TBI have produced conflicting results. These inconsistencies may be due to patient heterogeneity as well as the fact that vigilance performance is dependent on highly specific features of the task design. We developed a visual vigilance task in which the influence of non-attentional factors was minimized and task difficulty for patients and controls made comparable. Performance was characterized with respect to vigilance level as well as vigilance decrement, using measures of perceptual discrimination, response bias, reaction time and reaction time variability. Twenty-six patients with recent TBI and 18 control subjects were tested on this task. A MANOVA of ranked scores revealed significantly different patient and control performance overall. Initial level of performance (vigilance level) was slower and more variable for patients than controls, and patients showed more conservative response biases. Deterioration over time (vigilance decrement) was steeper for patients than controls for reaction time, reaction time variability, and response bias. Deterioration in accuracy (D') did not differ significantly between patients and controls. Performance was not related to available measures of injury severity. Hypotheses relating arousal mechanisms to vigilance performance are discussed.
临床医生报告称,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在需要持续注意力的任务上常常存在困难,并且从神经解剖学和神经生理学角度来看,出现此类缺陷是有原因的。然而,针对TBI患者持续注意力或警觉性的实验室测量结果却相互矛盾。这些不一致可能是由于患者的异质性,以及警觉性表现取决于任务设计的高度特定特征这一事实。我们开发了一种视觉警觉任务,将非注意力因素的影响降至最低,并使患者和对照组的任务难度相当。使用感知辨别、反应偏差、反应时间和反应时间变异性等指标,从警觉水平和警觉性下降方面对表现进行了特征描述。26名近期患有TBI的患者和18名对照受试者参与了该任务测试。对排序分数进行的多变量方差分析显示,患者和对照组的总体表现存在显著差异。患者的初始表现水平(警觉水平)比对照组更慢且更具变异性,并且患者表现出更保守的反应偏差。随着时间推移,患者在反应时间、反应时间变异性和反应偏差方面的恶化程度比对照组更陡峭。患者和对照组在准确性(D')方面的恶化没有显著差异。表现与现有的损伤严重程度测量指标无关。文中讨论了将唤醒机制与警觉性表现相关联的假设。