Murakami M
Department of Radiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health.
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1995 Aug;55(9):651-8.
The usefulness and clinical applicability of computed radiography (FCR) in X-ray examination of the stomach were evaluated in comparison with film-screen (FS) radiography by both phantom experiments and clinical studies. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis consisting of 25 normal and 25 artificially created simulated lesions on an originally created Styrofoam phantom showed no difference in lesion detectability between FCR and FS radiography. Both were also equal in evaluation of the internal structure and margin of the 25 lesions by visual ranking. ROC curve analysis of clinical cases was performed in 30 cases, 20 normal and 10 abnormal, while evaluation by visual ranking was performed on 18 lesions. There was no significant difference between FCR and FS radiography either with ROC curve analysis or visual ranking, although the variations were somewhat greater in the clinical cases than in the phantom studies. I conclude that FCR is equal to FS radiography in X-ray examination of the stomach regarding both the detectability and visual conspicuity of the lesion. In view of the other advantages of FCR, it can safely replace conventional FS radiography in X-ray examination of the stomach.
通过体模实验和临床研究,将计算机X线摄影(FCR)与屏-片(FS)摄影在胃部X线检查中的实用性和临床适用性进行了比较。在最初制作的聚苯乙烯泡沫体模上,对25例正常情况和25例人工模拟病变进行的接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,FCR和FS摄影在病变可检测性方面没有差异。通过视觉分级对25个病变的内部结构和边缘进行评估时,二者也相当。对30例临床病例进行了ROC曲线分析(20例正常,10例异常),同时对18个病变进行了视觉分级评估。尽管临床病例中的变异程度比体模研究中的稍大,但无论是ROC曲线分析还是视觉分级,FCR和FS摄影之间均无显著差异。我得出结论,在胃部X线检查中,FCR在病变的可检测性和视觉清晰度方面与FS摄影相当。鉴于FCR的其他优点,它可以安全地取代传统的FS摄影用于胃部X线检查。