Suppr超能文献

通过鼻双水平气道正压通气回路输送β-肾上腺素能激动剂气雾剂治疗急性支气管痉挛。

Treatment of acute bronchospasm with beta-adrenergic agonist aerosols delivered by a nasal bilevel positive airway pressure circuit.

作者信息

Pollack C V, Fleisch K B, Dowsey K

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;26(5):552-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70003-x.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether beta-adrenergic agonist aerosols are more effective in treating acute bronchospasm if delivered by nasal bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) than by a small-volume nebulizer (SVN). We hypothesized that BiPAP would reduce the work of breathing in asthmatic patients and thereby hasten improvement of bronchospasm from beta-agonist therapy. Previous trials with aerosols given by intermittent positive-pressure breathing were unrewarding, but BiPAP is unique in that inspiratory (IPAP) and expiratory (EPAP) support pressures may be set separately.

DESIGN

Convenience-randomized prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Emergency department of an urban tertiary care teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Afebrile, wheezing patients between 18 and 40 years of age.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive two doses of aerosolized albuterol (2.5 mg in 3 mL normal saline solution), 20 minutes apart, delivered by either SVN (n = 40) or BiPAP (n = 60) by nosemask or facemask (IPAP, 10 cm H2O; EPAP, 5 cm H2O).

RESULTS

Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), arterial blood oxygen saturation (by pulse oximetry), and pulse and respiratory rates were measured at baseline and after each treatment. The two treatment groups had similar values for pulse oximetry, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and percent of predicted peak expiratory flow rate (%PPEFR) at entry, and all patients experienced similar changes in the first three of these variables through the course of treatment. BiPAP patients had a significantly greater increase in %PPEFR after each treatment (P = .0011) and from baseline to completion (P = .0013). Increase in absolute PEFR was greater in the BiPAP group (from 211 +/- 89 [mean +/- SD] to 357 +/- 108 L/minute for BiPAP, from 183 +/- 60 to 280 +/- 87 L/minute for SVN; P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this population, response to initial ED management of bronchospasm, as measured by PEFR, was better with aerosols delivered by BiPAP than with those delivered by SVN.

摘要

研究目的

确定经鼻双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)输送β-肾上腺素能激动剂气雾剂治疗急性支气管痉挛是否比小容量雾化器(SVN)更有效。我们假设BiPAP能降低哮喘患者的呼吸功,从而加快β-激动剂治疗引起的支气管痉挛改善。先前关于间歇正压通气给予气雾剂的试验未取得成效,但BiPAP的独特之处在于吸气(IPAP)和呼气(EPAP)支持压力可分别设置。

设计

便利随机前瞻性临床研究。

地点

城市三级护理教学医院急诊科。

参与者

18至40岁的无发热、喘息患者。

干预措施

患者随机分为两组,间隔20分钟接受两剂雾化沙丁胺醇(2.5毫克溶于3毫升生理盐水中),通过鼻罩或面罩由SVN(n = 40)或BiPAP(n = 60)输送(IPAP,10厘米水柱;EPAP,5厘米水柱)。

结果

在基线及每次治疗后测量呼气峰值流速(PEFR)、动脉血氧饱和度(通过脉搏血氧饱和度测定)以及脉搏和呼吸频率。两个治疗组在入组时脉搏血氧饱和度、脉搏率、呼吸频率和预计呼气峰值流速百分比(%PPEFR)的值相似,并且在治疗过程中所有患者在这些变量中的前三项经历了相似的变化。BiPAP组每次治疗后及从基线到治疗结束时%PPEFR的增加显著更大(P = 0.0011)和(P = 0.0013)。BiPAP组绝对PEFR的增加更大(BiPAP组从211±89[平均值±标准差]升至357±108升/分钟,SVN组从183±60升至280±87升/分钟;P = 0.0001)。

结论

在该人群中,以PEFR衡量,BiPAP输送气雾剂对支气管痉挛初始急诊处理的反应优于SVN输送的气雾剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验