Brusa A, Mortimer C, Jones S J
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Nov;96(6):485-94. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00152-o.
The VEPs of 195 patients referred for supportive evidence of multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis were studied by a new method of interleaved checkerboard reversal stimulation of different areas of the visual field. In the first group of 95 patients checks of 40' subtense reversed in the whole field (28 degrees x 20 degrees), alternatively in the left and right hemifields and alternately in the central (5 degrees radius) and peripheral fields. In the second group of 100 patients checks reversed in the whole field and in interleaved mode in 3 visual field areas, comprising the central (4 degrees radius) and left and right hemisurround fields. In the first group abnormal responses were recorded from 52 eyes and there was partial disagreement among the stimulus conditions in 10 of the 52. Abnormalities were seen uniquely to central field stimulation in 3 eyes but never to whole field stimulation alone. In the second group abnormal responses were recorded in 58 eyes, again never uniquely to whole field stimulation, while abnormalities confined to one or two areas of the visual field were seen in 24, providing evidence of peripheral field involvement alone in 8 eyes. In the first group, waveforms created from the sum of the left and right hemifield and central and peripheral field responses showed quite close conformity to the whole field VEP, although amplitudes were significantly lower and latencies significantly shorter. In 7 eyes responses would have been differently classified (normal or abnormal) using the sum as compared with the whole fields.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用一种新的交错棋盘格反转刺激视野不同区域的方法,对195例因疑似多发性硬化症或视神经炎而转诊以寻求支持性证据的患者的视觉诱发电位(VEP)进行了研究。在第一组95例患者中,40'视角的方格在整个视野(28度×20度)中反转,交替在左、右半视野以及中央(5度半径)和周边视野中进行。在第二组100例患者中,方格在整个视野中反转,并以交错模式在3个视野区域中进行,包括中央(4度半径)以及左、右半周边视野。在第一组中,52只眼睛记录到异常反应,其中52只中的10只在不同刺激条件下存在部分不一致。3只眼睛仅在中央视野刺激时出现异常,但单独的全视野刺激从未出现异常。在第二组中,58只眼睛记录到异常反应,同样单独的全视野刺激从未出现异常,而仅局限于一个或两个视野区域的异常在24只眼睛中出现,这为8只眼睛仅存在周边视野受累提供了证据。在第一组中,由左、右半视野以及中央和周边视野反应总和生成的波形与全视野VEP相当吻合,尽管波幅明显较低且潜伏期明显较短。与全视野相比,使用总和波形时,7只眼睛的反应分类会有所不同(正常或异常)。(摘要截选至250字)