Faulkner R A, McCulloch R G, Fyke S L, De Coteau W E, McKay H A, Bailey D A, Houston C S, Wilkinson A A
College of Physical Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Osteoporos Int. 1995;5(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01774017.
We compared areal bone mineral density (BMD) of the total body (TBMD), antero-posterior lumbar spine at L3 (APS), lateral spine at L3 (LS) and femoral neck (FN). In order to understand better the effect of gender-related size differences on BMD, we also compared the estimated volumetric BMD at L3 (VLS) and the femoral neck (VFN). Subjects were asymptomatic women (n = 22) and men (n = 44) with an age range of 58-79 years. BMD at each site was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using a Hologic 2000 in array mode. Results of the statistical analyses (ANOVA) showed the men to have significantly greater BMD at all areal sites [APS, LS (p < 0.05); FN (p < 0.01); TBMD (p < 0.001)]. The two estimated volumetric comparisons, however, showed no gender differences. Results demonstrate how measures from areal BMD measures can be misleading when comparing groups of different size. In older men and women planar measures may overestimate gender differences in BMD.
