Suppr超能文献

基因扩增的倾向:不同方案、细胞系及选择剂的比较

The propensity for gene amplification: a comparison of protocols, cell lines, and selection agents.

作者信息

Sharma R C, Schimke R T

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University 94305.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1994 Jan 16;304(2):243-60. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90217-8.

Abstract

We have studied cell lines of rodent and human origin for their propensity to become resistant to antifolates (methotrexate, trimetrexate), phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), and colcemid, resistances associated with amplification of the DHFR, CAD, and MDR1 genes, respectively. We have employed two different methods: (1) a shallow step-wise selection protocol, where time to attain specified resistance is the quantitative measure, (2) the frequency of resistant colonies at specified drug concentrations. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods, the two methods gave the same relative ranking of cell lines. Striking differences in the propensity for gene amplification (resistance) were found: human cell lines were less prone to amplify genes than Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. This ranking was similar with all of the agents employed. Additionally, we observed that whereas PALA resistance in CHO cells is associated with amplification of the CAD gene, PALA resistance in the two human cell lines studied (HeLaS3 and VA13) was not associated with amplification and/or overexpression of the CAD gene, and thus this resistance to PALA occurs by an unknown mechanism.

摘要

我们研究了源自啮齿动物和人类的细胞系对抗叶酸剂(甲氨蝶呤、三甲曲沙)、膦酰乙酰-L-天冬氨酸(PALA)和秋水仙酰胺的耐药倾向,这些耐药性分别与二氢叶酸还原酶(DHFR)、天冬氨酸转氨甲酰酶(CAD)和多药耐药基因1(MDR1)的扩增相关。我们采用了两种不同的方法:(1)一种浅度逐步选择方案,其中达到特定耐药所需的时间作为定量指标,(2)在特定药物浓度下耐药集落的频率。虽然这两种方法都有优缺点,但它们对细胞系的相对排名相同。我们发现基因扩增(耐药)倾向存在显著差异:人类细胞系比中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞系更不容易扩增基因。所有使用的药物的排名都类似。此外,我们观察到,虽然CHO细胞对PALA的耐药性与CAD基因的扩增相关,但在所研究的两个人类细胞系(HeLaS3和VA13)中,对PALA的耐药性与CAD基因的扩增和/或过表达无关,因此这种对PALA的耐药性是通过未知机制发生的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验