de la Rosette J J, Froeling F M, Alivizatos G, Debruyne F M
Department of Urology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 1994;25(1):19-24. doi: 10.1159/000475240.
Twenty-four patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated with the Nd:YAG laser. We review our experience with two different techniques: the ultrasound-guided transurethral laser-induced prostatectomy (TULIP) and the visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP). Our experience with these two different laser systems shows that the treatment is relatively simple, speedy and performed with virtually no blood loss. The results, of both the TULIP and VLAP procedures, are excellent. The symptom scores decrease from 43 to 19 (TULIP) and 48 to 9 (VLAP). Furthermore, there is a marked increase in average uroflow from 7.9 to 18.6 ml/s (TULIP) and from 8.1 to 18.0 ml/s (VLAP). The patients with the TULIP procedure, however had more pronounced posttreatment complaints. These patients more often received antibiotics. Laser therapy of the prostate, although still in its infancy, gives excellent results and has substantial advantages over conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Laser therapy may replace TURP within several years.
24例良性前列腺增生患者接受了钕钇铝石榴石激光治疗。我们回顾了使用两种不同技术的经验:超声引导经尿道激光诱导前列腺切除术(TULIP)和可视激光前列腺消融术(VLAP)。我们使用这两种不同激光系统的经验表明,该治疗相对简单、迅速,且几乎无失血。TULIP和VLAP手术的效果都非常好。症状评分从43降至19(TULIP),从48降至9(VLAP)。此外,平均尿流率显著增加,从7.9增至18.6毫升/秒(TULIP),从8.1增至18.0毫升/秒(VLAP)。然而,接受TULIP手术的患者术后抱怨更明显。这些患者更常接受抗生素治疗。前列腺激光治疗尽管仍处于起步阶段,但效果极佳,与传统经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)相比有显著优势。激光治疗可能在几年内取代TURP。