Fenske R A, Lu C
Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1994 May;55(5):425-32. doi: 10.1080/15428119491018862.
This study was designed to develop standard procedures whereby the removal efficiency of handwash techniques can be determined. A known amount of the insecticide chlorpyrifos (Dursban), was transferred to the hands of volunteers, which were washed by a standard technique. The following experimental variables were studied: time between exposure and washing, washing solvent, and skin loading. Ethanol removed only 30% of the chlorpyrifos on skin at loadings of approximately 7 micrograms/cm2, with residence time on skin having no effect. Prewashing with ethanol increased removal efficiency. A 10% isopropanol/distilled-water wash removed 43% immediately following exposure, and 23% one hour post-exposure, with skin loadings of approximately 12 micrograms/cm2. Removal efficiency immediately following contact decreased for lower skin loading levels (21-23% for loadings of 0.1-1 micrograms/cm2). These findings indicate that substantial amounts of the insecticide were either absorbed through or adsorbed to the skin, and that pesticide residue levels recovered by standard handwashing techniques are unlikely to represent accurate estimates of dermal exposure. Approximately two-fold to five-fold underestimations of exposure can occur for pesticides with handwash procedures similar to those tested. All experimental variables studied can each alter significantly the fraction of total pesticide on skin that handwashing removes. If handwashing is to be used to estimate dermal exposure in the workplace, appropriate laboratory-based removal efficiency studies should be conducted prior to field investigations. Further efforts should be made to develop accurate and reproducible hand measurement techniques.
本研究旨在制定标准程序,以便能够确定洗手技术的去除效率。将已知量的杀虫剂毒死蜱(敌百虫)转移到志愿者手上,然后用标准技术进行清洗。研究了以下实验变量:接触与清洗之间的时间、清洗溶剂和皮肤负载量。在皮肤负载量约为7微克/平方厘米时,乙醇仅去除了皮肤上30%的毒死蜱,且在皮肤上的停留时间没有影响。用乙醇预洗可提高去除效率。在皮肤负载量约为12微克/平方厘米时,用10%异丙醇/蒸馏水清洗,接触后立即去除43%,接触一小时后去除23%。对于较低的皮肤负载水平(0.1 - 1微克/平方厘米的负载量时为21 - 23%),接触后立即的去除效率降低。这些发现表明,大量杀虫剂要么被皮肤吸收,要么吸附在皮肤上,而且通过标准洗手技术回收的农药残留水平不太可能准确估计皮肤接触量。对于与测试程序类似的洗手程序的农药,可能会出现约两倍至五倍的接触量低估情况。所研究的所有实验变量均可显著改变洗手去除的皮肤表面总农药比例。如果要使用洗手来估计工作场所的皮肤接触量,应在现场调查之前进行适当的基于实验室的去除效率研究。应进一步努力开发准确且可重复的手部测量技术。