Suppr超能文献

毒死蜱残留从居住表面向皮肤的转移:在播撒和气溶胶农药施用后,对手压、手拖、擦拭和聚氨酯泡沫滚筒测量方法的比较

Dermal transfer of chlorpyrifos residues from residential surfaces: comparison of hand press, hand drag, wipe, and polyurethane foam roller measurements after broadcast and aerosol pesticide applications.

作者信息

Lu C, Fenske R A

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7234, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):463-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107463.

Abstract

Indoor residential pesticide applications present the potential for human exposures, particularly for small children. Personal contact with target and nontarget surfaces can result in transfer of pesticides to the skin, but the magnitude of such transfer is uncertain. This research compared surface sampling techniques [wipe and polyurethane foam (PUF) roller] with the removal ability of human skin following broadcast and total aerosol release applications of Dursban (Dow Elanco, Midland, MI), a residential formulation containing the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Hands were washed immediately after surface contact, following a protocol that included a laboratory-generated adjustment factor to account for incomplete removal of chlorpyrifos from skin. Chlorpyrifos transfer was similar for hand press and hand drag techniques, averaging approximately 1-6 ng/cm2 of carpet contacted. These amounts represented < 1% of the amount of chlorpyrifos deposited on the surfaces 3.5 hr earlier. Chlorpyrifos transfer from carpet to skin was 23-24 times lower than for wipe sampling and 33-36 times lower than for PUF roller sampling (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0006 for broadcast and aerosol applications, respectively). Hand press sampling removed approximately 4.5 times less chlorpyrifos from nontarget furniture surfaces (12 ng/cm2) than did wipe sampling (56 ng/cm2; p = 0.009). Chlorpyrifos residues on carpet were substantially higher after broadcast applications than after aerosol applications, but residues on such nontarget surfaces as furniture were substantially higher for the aerosol application. This study indicates that human skin removes substantially less residue from carpets and furniture than either conventional wipe or PUF roller sampling methods following residential pest control applications of chlorpyrifos. Although this paper focuses on quantifying residue transfer from surface to skin using different surface sampling techniques, no attempt is made to quantify the amount of chlorpyrifos residue that is subsequently absorbed.

摘要

在室内住宅中使用杀虫剂有可能导致人体接触,尤其是对幼儿而言。与目标和非目标表面的直接接触会使杀虫剂转移到皮肤上,但这种转移的程度尚不确定。本研究比较了两种表面采样技术[擦拭法和聚氨酯泡沫(PUF)滚筒法]与在播撒和全量气溶胶释放施用含有杀虫剂毒死蜱的家用制剂“敌敌涕”(陶氏益农公司,密歇根州米德兰市)后人体皮肤的去除能力。在与表面接触后立即洗手,遵循的方案中包含一个实验室生成的调整因子,以考虑毒死蜱从皮肤上未完全去除的情况。手压和手拖技术的毒死蜱转移情况相似,接触地毯的平均转移量约为1 - 6纳克/平方厘米。这些量占3.5小时前沉积在表面的毒死蜱量的不到1%。从地毯到皮肤的毒死蜱转移量比擦拭采样低23 - 24倍,比PUF滚筒采样低33 - 36倍(播撒和气溶胶施用分别为p = 0.0007和p = 0.0006)。手压采样从未目标家具表面去除的毒死蜱量(12纳克/平方厘米)比擦拭采样(56纳克/平方厘米)少约4.5倍(p = 0.009)。播撒施用后地毯上的毒死蜱残留量显著高于气溶胶施用后,但家具等非目标表面上的残留量在气溶胶施用后显著更高。本研究表明,在住宅进行毒死蜱害虫防治施用后,人体皮肤从地毯和家具上去除的残留量比传统擦拭或PUF滚筒采样方法少得多。尽管本文重点是使用不同表面采样技术量化从表面到皮肤的残留转移量,但未尝试量化随后吸收的毒死蜱残留量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验