Wellings K
Department of public health and policy, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
Soz Praventivmed. 1994;39 Suppl 1:S14-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01322422.
One aim of this EC Concerted Action Programme has been to compare and contrast AIDS/HIV prevention strategies aimed at the general population, and the methods used to assess them, in order to arrive at a better understanding of how public education in this area might optimally be effected and evaluated. To this end, data have been collected on interventions and their evaluation for selected European countries by means of site visits, postal questionnaires and expert meetings of those involved. These data have been analysed where possible in relation to other relevant variables including the social and political context in which AIDS public education has taken place, the existing tradition of health education, the financial and manpower resources available and the nature of the HIV epidemic in each country. Initial analysis shows that there have been remarkable parallels between AIDS public education campaigns in different European countries in terms, for example, of their sequence and progression, and their content. At the same time, essential differences are apparent with respect to the ease with which it has been possible to implement strategies, the tone and style of initiatives, and their reception by and effect on the general population. Attempts to attribute these differences to specific cultural, political or operational factors are difficult, but the cross national comparison holds valuable lessons for both campaigns and their evaluation.
这一欧盟联合行动计划的一个目标是比较和对比针对普通人群的艾滋病/艾滋病毒预防策略及其评估方法,以便更好地理解如何以最佳方式开展和评估该领域的公共教育。为此,通过实地考察、邮政问卷调查以及相关人员的专家会议,收集了选定欧洲国家的干预措施及其评估数据。在可能的情况下,已针对其他相关变量对这些数据进行了分析,这些变量包括开展艾滋病公共教育的社会和政治背景、现有的健康教育传统、可用的财政和人力资源以及每个国家的艾滋病毒流行情况。初步分析表明,不同欧洲国家的艾滋病公共教育运动在诸如顺序和进程以及内容等方面存在显著相似之处。与此同时,在实施策略的难易程度、举措的语气和风格以及它们被普通人群接受的程度和对普通人群的影响方面,明显存在本质差异。将这些差异归因于特定文化、政治或操作因素的尝试很困难,但跨国比较对运动及其评估都具有宝贵的借鉴意义。