• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标检测任务中的反应准备:正常受试者刺激前和刺激后事件相关电位

Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects.

作者信息

Starr A, Sandroni P, Michalewski H J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine 92717.

出版信息

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;96(1):76-92. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00162-e.

DOI:10.1016/0013-4694(94)00162-e
PMID:7530191
Abstract

Brain potentials were recorded from 12 normal subjects engaged in an auditory target detection task (target stimulus probability of 0.2, stimulus rate of 1 every 2 sec) when instructions were (1) to press a response button with the thumb of the dominant hand to each target or (2) to keep a mental count of each target. A pre-stimulus slow negative potential was identified before every stimulus except non-targets immediately after targets. The amplitude of the pre-stimulus negativity was significantly affected by task instructions and was up to 4 times larger during the button press than the mental count condition. In contrast, the amplitudes and latencies of the event-related components (N100, P200, N200 and P300), when slow potentials were removed by filtering, were not different as a function of press or count instructions. The immediately preceding stimulus sequence affected both the amplitude and onset latency of the pre-stimulus negativity; both measures increased as the number of preceding non-targets increased. The amplitude of the pre-stimulus negative shift to targets also increased significantly as RT speed decreased. The major portion of the pre-stimulus negative potential is considered a readiness potential (RP) reflecting preparations to make a motor response. The amplitude of the RP during the target detection task did not significantly lateralize in contrast to the RP accompanying self-paced movements.

摘要

从12名参与听觉目标检测任务的正常受试者身上记录脑电信号(目标刺激概率为0.2,刺激频率为每2秒1次),任务指令为:(1) 用优势手的拇指按下响应按钮对每个目标做出反应;(2) 对每个目标进行心算。在每个刺激(除了紧跟目标之后的非目标刺激)之前都识别出一个刺激前慢负电位。刺激前负电位的幅度受任务指令的显著影响,在按键反应时比心算条件下大4倍。相比之下,当通过滤波去除慢电位后,事件相关成分(N100、P200、N200和P300)的幅度和潜伏期,在按键或心算指令条件下并无差异。紧接在前的刺激序列影响刺激前负电位的幅度和起始潜伏期;随着前序非目标刺激数量的增加,这两个指标均升高。对目标的刺激前负向偏移幅度也随着反应时速度的降低而显著增加。刺激前负电位的主要部分被认为是反映做出运动反应准备状态的准备电位(RP)。与伴随自主节奏运动的准备电位相比,目标检测任务期间准备电位的幅度没有明显的偏侧化。

相似文献

1
Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects.目标检测任务中的反应准备:正常受试者刺激前和刺激后事件相关电位
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;96(1):76-92. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00162-e.
2
Sequential changes of auditory processing during target detection: motor responding versus mental counting.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;105(3):201-12. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00016-7.
3
Effects of stimulus sequence on event-related potentials and reaction time during target detection in Alzheimer's disease.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Aug;111(8):1438-49. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00332-1.
4
Brain potentials before and during memory scanning.记忆扫描之前及期间的脑电位。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;99(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/0921-884x(96)95147-4.
5
Grouping mechanisms in response preparation investigated with event-related brain potentials.运用事件相关脑电位研究反应准备中的分组机制。
Psychophysiology. 2012 Mar;49(3):421-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01310.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
6
Contingent negative variation (CNV) associated with sensorimotor timing error correction.与感觉运动定时误差校正相关的关联性负变(CNV)。
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.071. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
7
Is a stimulus conveying task-relevant information a sufficient condition to elicit a stimulus-preceding negativity?
Psychophysiology. 1994 Mar;31(2):129-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01033.x.
8
On the regularity of preparatory activity preceding movements with the dominant and non-dominant hand: a readiness potential study.优势手和非优势手运动前预备活动的规律性:准备电位研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Aug;81(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 14.
9
Differences in the transmission of sensory input into motor output between introverts and extraverts: Behavioral and psychophysiological analyses.内向者与外向者在感觉输入向运动输出传递过程中的差异:行为学与心理生理学分析。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Dec;56(3):293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.07.004.
10
Distribution of slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task.时间估计任务中与运动准备和刺激预期相关的慢脑电位分布
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Mar;69(3):234-43. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90132-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Movement of the stimulated finger in a Go/NoGo task enhances attention directed to that finger as evidenced by P300 amplitude modulation.在“是/否”任务中,受刺激手指的运动增强了对该手指的注意力,这一点通过P300波幅调制得到了证实。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Dec 5;17:1178509. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1178509. eCollection 2023.
2
Classification Strategies for P300-Based BCI-Spellers Adopting the Row Column Paradigm.基于行列范式的 P300 脑-机接口拼写器的分类策略。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;22(23):9159. doi: 10.3390/s22239159.
3
A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli that are difficult to suppress.
与无法进行任务相关的额前负向波,对难以抑制的无关刺激更大。
Behav Brain Funct. 2009 Jun 25;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-25.
4
Centrifugal regulation of a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement without a preceding warning signal.在没有先前警告信号的情况下,对触发自主运动的与任务相关的体感信号进行离心调节。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;173(4):733-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0448-0. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
5
The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.禁行 P300“前移”效应与反应抑制
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;115(7):1550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.028.
6
Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography.按键操作会影响P300波幅和头皮地形图。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Sep;112(9):1676-84. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00607-1.