Houston D M
Institute of Social and Applied Psychology, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 1995 Sep;34 ( Pt 3):293-302. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01065.x.
A replication of Metalsky, Halberstadt & Abramson's (1987) test of the revised hopelessness model of depression was conducted. Depressive mood response to examination outcome was assessed in undergraduate students across two periods of examination. In phase 1, consistent with Metalsky et al. (1987), examination outcome was the sole predictor of depressive mood response on receipt of exam results. There was no evidence for a delayed mood response five days later. In phase 2, the interaction between attributional style and exam outcome was predictive of depressive mood response on receipt of exam results. Taken together, the results provide support for the diathesis-stress and specific vulnerability components of the model with respect to immediate mood response. No support was found for the causal mediation component. Differences between recently published studies are reported and implications for the model discussed.
对梅塔斯基、哈尔伯施塔特和阿布拉姆森（1987年）对抑郁症修订无望模型的测试进行了复制研究。在两个考试阶段对本科生考试结果的抑郁情绪反应进行了评估。在第一阶段，与梅塔斯基等人（1987年）的研究一致，考试结果是收到考试成绩时抑郁情绪反应的唯一预测因素。没有证据表明五天后会出现延迟情绪反应。在第二阶段，归因方式与考试结果之间的相互作用可预测收到考试成绩时的抑郁情绪反应。综合来看，研究结果为该模型在即时情绪反应方面的素质-压力和特定易感性成分提供了支持。未发现对因果中介成分的支持。报告了最近发表的研究之间的差异，并讨论了该模型的意义。
