Klein A H, Harner C D, Fu F H
Center for Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1217, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3(2):117-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01552387.
The Bankart lesion of the shoulder has long been associated with anterior instability. Our laboratory has developed a biomechanical model of the human shoulder which was used to determine the effects of creating a Bankart lesion on cadaveric specimens and then to compare the effects of two repair techniques. The model simulates the abducted, externally rotated position of the glenohumeral joint and uses pneumatic cylinders to simulate the rotator cuff forces. Specimens were tested intact following a partial Bankart lesion, following a complete Bankart lesion, and after performing a Bankart repair using three Mitek suture anchors. Finally, both the traditional and Mitek repairs were tested until failure. Strain in the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) and torque resistance was measured as an indication of instability of the joint. Strain was noted to decrease with increasing depth of lesion of the IGHL. Torsional rigidity of the shoulder decreased with increasing depth of lesion as well. Repairing the shoulder restores the strain and rigidity to control conditions. The mean load until failure was greater with the traditional repair than with the suture anchor technique. This study quantitates the effects of a Bankart lesion of the shoulder, and demonstrates that repairing the lesion with a suture anchor technique restores the biomechanics of the shoulder.
