Suppr超能文献

透析液温度对中心血流动力学和尿素动力学的影响。

Effect of dialysate temperature on central hemodynamics and urea kinetics.

作者信息

Yu A W, Ing T S, Zabaneh R I, Daugirdas J T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 1995 Jul;48(1):237-43. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.289.

Abstract

Use of cool dialysate is associated with increased intradialytic blood pressure, but the hemodynamic mechanism is unknown. Whether changes in dialysate temperature affect muscle blood flow, which may the alter the degree of urea compartmentalization, also is unknown. We measured hemodynamics and blood and dialysate-side urea kinetic indices in nine hemodialysis patients during two cool (35.0 degrees C) versus two warm (37.5 degrees C) dialysate treatments. The % change in mean arterial pressure was different when using the cool (+6.5 +/- 9.7 mm Hg) versus the warm (-13.4 +/- 3.6) dialysate (P < 0.01), despite comparable amounts of fluid removal. Percent changes in cardiac output were similar with the two dialysates, and thus the blood pressure effect was due primarily to changes in total peripheral resistance (% delta TPR, cool +26 +/- 13.6, warm +8.6 +/- 14.5; P < 0.02). During cool dialysate use tympanic membrane temperature changed by -0.51 +/- 0.23 degree C, whereas body temperature increased by 0.52 +/- 0.14 degree C during use of warm dialysate. Measured urea recovery normalized to the predialysis urea nitrogen concentration was similar with the two treatments: cool 31.3 +/- 0.039 liter-1; warm 29.7 +/- 0.021; P = NS. In a second study, post-dialysis urea rebound values from 15 seconds to 30 minutes, expressed as the percent of the post-dialysis SUN, were similar after the two treatments: cool 11.79 +/- 1.4; warm 12.21 +/- 2.27, P = NS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

使用低温透析液与透析中血压升高有关,但血流动力学机制尚不清楚。透析液温度的变化是否会影响肌肉血流量,进而改变尿素的分布程度,目前也不清楚。我们在9名血液透析患者中,测量了两种低温(35.0摄氏度)透析液治疗与两种高温(37.5摄氏度)透析液治疗期间的血流动力学以及血液和透析液侧的尿素动力学指标。尽管液体清除量相当,但使用低温透析液(平均动脉压变化+6.5±9.7毫米汞柱)与高温透析液(-13.4±3.6)时,平均动脉压的变化百分比不同(P<0.01)。两种透析液下的心输出量变化百分比相似,因此血压变化主要是由于总外周阻力的改变(低温时总外周阻力变化百分比+26±13.6,高温时+8.6±14.5;P<0.02)。使用低温透析液时鼓膜温度变化为-0.51±0.23摄氏度,而使用高温透析液时体温升高0.52±0.14摄氏度。两种治疗方式下,以透析前尿素氮浓度标准化后的测量尿素清除率相似:低温时为31.3±0.039升-1;高温时为29.7±0.021;P=无显著性差异。在第二项研究中,两种治疗后透析后15秒至30分钟的尿素反弹值,以透析后血清尿素氮的百分比表示,相似:低温时为11.79±1.4;高温时为12.21±2.27,P=无显著性差异。(摘要截选至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验