• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development of structure-activity relationship rules for predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals.

作者信息

Woo Y T, Lai D Y, Argus M F, Arcos J C

机构信息

Health and Environmental Review Division (7403), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 1995 Sep;79(1-3):219-28. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03373-s.

DOI:10.1016/0378-4274(95)03373-s
PMID:7570659
Abstract

Since the inception of Section 5 (Premanufacturing/Premarketing Notification, PMN) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis has been effectively used by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Structure Activity Team (SAT) in the assessment of potential carcinogenic hazard of new chemicals for which test data are not available. To capture, systematize and codify the Agency's predictive expertise in order to make it more widely available to assessors outside the TSCA program, a cooperative project was initiated to develop a knowledge rule-based expert system to mimic the thinking and reasoning of the SAT. In this communication, we describe the overall structure of this expert system, discuss the scientific bases and principles of SAR analysis of chemical carcinogens used in the development of SAR knowledge rules, and delineate the major factors/rules useful for assessing the carcinogenic potential of fibers, polymers, metals/metalloids and several major classes of organic chemicals. An integrative approach using available short-term predictive tests and non-cancer toxicological data to supplement SAR analysis has also been described.

摘要

相似文献

1
Development of structure-activity relationship rules for predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
Toxicol Lett. 1995 Sep;79(1-3):219-28. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03373-s.
2
Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5.有限数据情况下的作用方式及化学危害评估:根据《有毒物质控制法》第5条使用构效关系(SAR)
Environ Health Perspect. 1990 Jul;87:183-97. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9087183.
3
The new chemicals process at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): structure-activity relationships for hazard identification and risk assessment.美国环境保护局(EPA)的新化学物质处理方法:用于危害识别和风险评估的构效关系
Toxicol Lett. 1995 Sep;79(1-3):67-73. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03358-r.
4
Assessment and validation of US EPA's OncoLogic® expert system and analysis of its modulating factors for structural alerts.美国环境保护局(US EPA)OncoLogic®专家系统的评估与验证及其结构警报调节因素分析
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(2):152-73. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.681486.
5
International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Application of SAR methods to non-congeneric data bases associated with carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: issues and approaches.国际环境诱变剂和致癌物防护委员会。构效关系方法在与致癌性和诱变性相关的非同类数据库中的应用:问题与方法。
Mutat Res. 1994 Feb 1;305(1):73-97. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90127-9.
6
Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency.定量构效关系(QSAR)模型的开发,用于预测化学物质的致癌效力。二、使用口服斜率因子作为致癌效力的度量。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;59(2):215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.019. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
7
Chloroform: An EPA test case.氯仿:美国环境保护局的一个测试案例。
Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jul;107(7):A358-60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107a358.
8
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's revised guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment: evaluating a postulated mode of carcinogenic action in guiding dose-response extrapolation.美国环境保护局致癌物风险评估修订指南:在指导剂量反应外推中评估假定的致癌作用模式
Mutat Res. 2000 Jan 3;464(1):105-15. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00171-0.
9
Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.评价终生动物致癌试验在鉴定人类癌症危险度中的效用。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:550-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
10
Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.美国环保署实施的计算毒理学:为筛选和评估化学暴露、危害和风险提供高通量决策支持工具。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2010 Feb;13(2-4):197-217. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483935.

引用本文的文献

1
A Predictive Model for Toxicity Effects Assessment of Biotransformed Hepatic Drugs Using Iterative Sampling Method.基于迭代抽样方法的生物转化肝毒性药物毒性效应评估的预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 9;6:38660. doi: 10.1038/srep38660.
2
Weighted feature significance: a simple, interpretable model of compound toxicity based on the statistical enrichment of structural features.加权特征显著性:一种基于结构特征统计富集的简单、可解释的化合物毒性模型。
Toxicol Sci. 2009 Dec;112(2):385-93. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp231. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
3
In silico prediction of drug toxicity.
药物毒性的计算机模拟预测。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2003 Feb-Apr;17(2-4):119-27. doi: 10.1023/a:1025361621494.
4
Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.在国际决策框架中使用定量构效关系来预测化学物质对健康的影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1391-401. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5760.
5
Use of mechanism-based structure-activity relationships analysis in carcinogenic potential ranking for drinking water disinfection by-products.基于机制的构效关系分析在饮用水消毒副产物致癌潜力排序中的应用。
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Feb;110 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):75-87. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s175.
6
Multicomponent criteria for predicting carcinogenicity: dataset of 30 NTP chemicals.预测致癌性的多组分标准:30种美国国家毒理学计划化学品的数据集
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Oct;104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1105-12. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s51105.