Suppr超能文献

睾丸网腺癌。

Adenocarcinoma of the rete testis.

作者信息

Sánchez-Chapado M, Angulo J C, Haas G P

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Urology. 1995 Oct;46(4):468-75. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80257-X.

Abstract

To date, no studies have evaluated adenocarcinoma of the rete testis statistically, because reports have been limited to single cases or series of 2 cases only. Univariate and multivariate analyses on disease-free survival have been performed after combining all data available in the literature with our own. Information about disease-free survival has been collected in 38 patients. As many as 40% of them died within the first year of diagnosis. Three and 5-year disease-free survival was 49% and 13%, respectively. We have not detected any difference in survival between age groups or side of the lesion. Similarly, statistical difference cannot be proved between survival of tumors with nodular infiltrating or cystic growth pattern, although it has been suggested that these two varieties represent different tumor types from a gross and microscopic morphologic point of view. Univariate analysis reveals that tumor stage, tumor size, and therapy may have an influence on survival. Tumors that are organ-confined and small lesions (testicular mass < 5 cm in maximum diameter) behave definitely better than those disseminated at diagnosis or of a bigger size. Surprisingly, tumor size is not associated with tumor stage or histologic growth pattern (nodular infiltrating versus predominantly cystic). With regard to therapy, cases in which RPLND has been performed as part of the therapy behave better in univariate analysis, while patients who receive radiation do worse. Most probably these facts reflect that patients with clearly advanced disease where local control cannot be achieved by surgery tend to undergo palliative treatment by radiation. On the other hand, RPLND tends to be performed in patients in whom there is no evidence of distant spread. Therefore, it would really be the primary stage that would set the prognosis rather than the consequent treatment, and neither radiation therapy nor RPLND would be true independent variables. Similarly, no significant difference is observed when patients receive chemotherapy. Cox's regression analysis reveals size of the testicular tumor as the only independent predictor of survival. Stage at diagnosis does not have an influence by itself and neither does any form of therapy. In this sense, the negative effect of radiotherapy is eliminated. We are aware that the results drawn from a literature review are far from ideal, but there is not enough evidence to suggest an optimal sequence of treatment for this rare malignancy. To date, no effective chemotherapy has been found. Whenever the tumor is resectable, there appears to be merit in an RPLND.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

迄今为止,尚无研究对睾丸网腺癌进行统计学评估,因为相关报道仅限于单个病例或仅2例的系列病例。我们将文献中所有可用数据与我们自己的数据相结合后,对无病生存期进行了单因素和多因素分析。已收集了38例患者的无病生存期信息。其中多达40%的患者在诊断后的第一年内死亡。3年和5年无病生存率分别为49%和13%。我们未检测到年龄组或病变侧别之间在生存方面存在差异。同样,尽管从大体和显微镜形态学角度来看,这两种类型被认为代表不同的肿瘤类型,但在具有结节状浸润或囊性生长模式的肿瘤生存情况之间未证实存在统计学差异。单因素分析显示,肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小和治疗可能对生存有影响。局限于器官的小病变(睾丸肿块最大直径<5 cm)的肿瘤表现肯定优于诊断时已播散或体积较大的肿瘤。令人惊讶的是,肿瘤大小与肿瘤分期或组织学生长模式(结节状浸润与主要为囊性)无关。关于治疗,在单因素分析中,作为治疗一部分进行腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND)的病例表现较好,而接受放疗的患者情况较差。很可能这些事实反映出,对于局部无法通过手术控制的明显晚期疾病患者,往往倾向于接受姑息性放疗。另一方面,RPLND往往在无远处转移证据的患者中进行。因此,真正决定预后的可能是疾病的初始阶段而非后续治疗,放疗和RPLND都不是真正的独立变量。同样,患者接受化疗时也未观察到显著差异。Cox回归分析显示,睾丸肿瘤大小是生存的唯一独立预测因素。诊断时的分期本身并无影响,任何形式的治疗也无影响。从这个意义上说,放疗的负面影响被消除了。我们意识到,从文献综述得出的结果远非理想,但没有足够证据表明针对这种罕见恶性肿瘤的最佳治疗顺序。迄今为止,尚未发现有效的化疗方法。只要肿瘤可切除,进行RPLND似乎是有价值的。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验