Haver B, Svanborg P, Lindberg S
Karolinska Hospital, Magnus Huss Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 Aug;92(2):132-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09556.x.
The interrater reliability of data obtained by use of the Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP) was tested among 60 women seeking treatment for drinking problems. The first rater had a psychodynamic background but was minimally trained rating the KAPP subscales and performing KAPP interviews. Independent, blind ratings of audiotaped interviews by an experienced KAPP rater revealed that 8 of the subscales obtained satisfactory reliability, whereas 6 subscales showed unsatisfactory reliability. Furthermore, data for one subscale (normopathy) showed a zero correlation between raters, probably due to the novelty of the construct. Additionally 3 subscales related to bodily aspects were of little clinical significance among the present study group. Our data were compared with data from previous KAPP reliability studies, and the reasons for similarities and discrepancies of results are discussed.
在60名寻求饮酒问题治疗的女性中，对使用卡罗林斯卡心理动力剖面图（KAPP）获得的数据的评分者间信度进行了测试。第一位评分者具有心理动力学背景，但在对KAPP分量表进行评分和进行KAPP访谈方面接受的培训极少。一位经验丰富的KAPP评分者对录音访谈进行独立、盲法评分，结果显示8个分量表具有令人满意的信度，而6个分量表的信度不令人满意。此外，一个分量表（正常状态）的数据显示评分者之间的相关性为零，这可能是由于该结构的新颖性所致。另外，在本研究组中，3个与身体方面相关的分量表临床意义不大。我们将数据与之前KAPP信度研究的数据进行了比较，并讨论了结果异同的原因。
