Suppr超能文献

Clinical evaluation of the Vital system compared with the Hémoline diphasic method for the detection of aerobic blood cultures.

作者信息

Avril J L, Mathieu D, Saulnier C, Hignard M

机构信息

Laboratoire de bactériologie-virologie, Centre hospitalier régional et universitaire, Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1995;53(1-2):21-4.

PMID:7574086
Abstract

In a collaborative study at two university hospitals, the recovery of microorganisms and the speed of detection of microbial aerobic growth by the Vital system (bioMérieux) and a diphasic conventional blood culture system were compared. The Vital system monitors each blood culture bottle every 15 minutes to detect inactivation of fluorescent suspended in the broth medium due to microbial growth. A total of 1086 comparisons were made between the two systems, yielding a total of 117 isolates. Microorganisms were recovered more often from the Vital aerobic bottles (p < 0.05). The Vital system detected 43% of the microorganisms within the first 12 hours of incubation whereas in the same time the conventional system detected only 5% of the microorganisms. The results demonstrate that the Vital system is a reliable, continuous monitoring, fully automated system and an attractive alternative to conventional blood culture methods.

摘要

相似文献

9
Automated blood culture systems.自动化血培养系统
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1995;53(1-2):25-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验