Williams M B, Jope R S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294-0017, USA.
Brain Res. 1995 Jul 10;685(1-2):169-78. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00395-7.
Hippocampal and cortical EEG recordings in rats were used to monitor the in vivo modulation by lithium of responses to agonists for 5HT2/5HT1c serotonergic (DOI) and cholinergic (pilocarpine) receptors and the influence of inositol administration. Administration of DOI (8 mg/kg) or pilocarpine (30 mg/kg) to rats pretreated with lithium acutely (3 mmol/kg) or chronically (dietary, 4 weeks) resulted in seizures, whereas these doses did not cause seizures without lithium pretreatment. This indicated that lithium most likely affects a signal transduction process common to both systems, which is the phosphoinositide second messenger system. To examine the potential influence of altered inositol levels on these responses, we tested the effects of infusions (10 mg, i.c.v.) of myo-inositol, a precursor of phosphoinositide synthesis, and of epi-inositol, an isomer not used for phosphoinositide synthesis. Administration of myo-inositol (10 mg) slightly reduced the incidence of seizures induced by acute lithium plus DOI but almost completely blocked seizures induced by acute lithium plus pilocarpine. This was surprising since seizures induced by acute lithium plus DOI were less severe than those after acute lithium plus pilocarpine, but myo-inositol was more effective in blocking the latter. Epi-inositol also blocked seizures under both conditions but it was less effective than myo-inositol after treatment with acute lithium plus pilocarpine. The latencies to seizures and/or severity of seizures were potentiated more by chronic than acute lithium pretreatment with both DOI and pilocarpine, but attenuation by myo-inositol was less with each agonist after chronic lithium compared with acute lithium treatment. Peripheral administration of a high dose of myo-inositol blocked seizures induced by acute lithium plus pilocarpine, but the inositol treatment itself was toxic and caused seizures prior to pilocarpine administration, so the mechanism of action cannot simply be attributed to increased brain inositol levels. These results demonstrate that lithium modulates the in vivo responses to DOI and pilocarpine, most probably through an effect on the phosphoinositide signal transduction system. They also show that centrally administered myo-inositol modifies responses to these agents, but the effectiveness of epi-inositol and other results leave unclear the mechanistic basis of its actions.
采用大鼠海马和皮质脑电图记录来监测锂对5HT2/5HT1c血清素能(DOI)和胆碱能(毛果芸香碱)受体激动剂反应的体内调节作用以及肌醇给药的影响。对急性(3 mmol/kg)或慢性(饮食,4周)给予锂预处理的大鼠给予DOI(8 mg/kg)或毛果芸香碱(30 mg/kg)会导致癫痫发作,而在没有锂预处理的情况下,这些剂量不会引起癫痫发作。这表明锂很可能影响两个系统共有的信号转导过程,即磷酸肌醇第二信使系统。为了研究肌醇水平改变对这些反应的潜在影响,我们测试了肌醇(磷酸肌醇合成的前体,10 mg,脑室内注射)和表肌醇(一种不用于磷酸肌醇合成的异构体)输注的效果。给予肌醇(10 mg)可略微降低急性锂加DOI诱导的癫痫发作发生率,但几乎完全阻断急性锂加毛果芸香碱诱导的癫痫发作。这很令人惊讶,因为急性锂加DOI诱导的癫痫发作比急性锂加毛果芸香碱后的癫痫发作轻,但肌醇在阻断后者方面更有效。表肌醇在两种情况下也能阻断癫痫发作,但在用急性锂加毛果芸香碱治疗后,其效果不如肌醇。与急性锂预处理相比,慢性锂预处理对DOI和毛果芸香碱诱发癫痫发作的潜伏期和/或严重程度的增强作用更大,但与急性锂治疗相比,慢性锂处理后每种激动剂引起的肌醇减弱作用较小。外周给予高剂量的肌醇可阻断急性锂加毛果芸香碱诱导的癫痫发作,但肌醇治疗本身有毒,并在给予毛果芸香碱之前引起癫痫发作,因此其作用机制不能简单地归因于脑内肌醇水平的升高。这些结果表明,锂调节对DOI和毛果芸香碱的体内反应,很可能是通过对磷酸肌醇信号转导系统的作用。它们还表明,脑室内给予肌醇可改变对这些药物的反应,但表肌醇的有效性和其他结果尚不清楚其作用的机制基础。