Suppr超能文献

确定原发部位不明的转移性癌的原发部位。X线检查方法的不足。

Identifying the primary site in metastatic cancer of unknown origin. Inadequacy of roentgenographic procedures.

作者信息

Nystrom J S, Weiner J M, Wolf R M, Bateman J R, Viola M V

出版信息

JAMA. 1979 Jan 26;241(4):381-3.

PMID:758556
Abstract

Two hundred sixty-six patients with metastatic nonsquamous carcinoma of unknown origin underwent upper and lower gastrointestinal series, intravenous pyelograms, and chest roentgenograms (CR) for location of a primary cancer site. Of 129 identified cancer sites, only 22 were verified antemortem, whereas necropsy disclosed 25 cases with false-positive examination results. The CR patterns thought typical for lung cancer (eg, single mass lesion and hilar or mediastinal adenopathy) were often shown (43%) to represent metastatic lesions. Because contrast roentgenographic studies are costly, uncomfortable, of low yield, and often misleading, they should be limited to cases with specific organ dysfunction.

摘要

266例不明原发灶的转移性非鳞状细胞癌患者接受了上、下消化道造影、静脉肾盂造影及胸部X线检查(CR)以确定原发癌部位。在129个确定的癌灶中,仅22个在生前得到证实,而尸检发现有25例检查结果为假阳性。被认为是肺癌典型的CR表现(如单发肿块病变及肺门或纵隔淋巴结肿大)常显示(43%)为转移灶。由于造影X线检查费用高、患者不适、阳性率低且常具误导性,应仅限于有特定器官功能障碍的病例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验