Favale S, Bardy G H, Pitzalis M V, Dicandia C D, Traversa M, Rizzon P
University of Bari, Institute of Cardiology, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 1995 May;16(5):704-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060977.
In this report a transvenous cardioverter defibrillator implantation is described in two patients with a persistent left-sided superior vena cava and right SVC atresia. In the first case, manoeuvring of the guide wire inserted through the left subclavian vein into the SVC proved impossible, revealing a left SVC originating from the left brachiocephalic vein with an acute corner. Changing the side of implantation and inserting a CPI Endotak catheter through the right subclavian vein, the lead was easily advanced through the left SVC into the coronary sinus and then into the right atrium with the tip abutting the lateral atrial wall. Subsequent manoeuvres allowed passage of the tip of the catheter into the right ventricular apex with the proximal defibrillation coil of the Endotak lead in the low left SVC, with its distal limit at the junction with the coronary sinus. A biphasic waveform single pathway RV - > left SVC successfully defibrillated with a stored energy of 5 J. In the second patient, implantation of a transvenous Medtronic system was possible from a left infraclavicular approach. A tripolar RV coil was inserted into the right ventricle via the persistent left SVC and contiguous coronary sinus. Because of the acute angle required to enter the RV in this second case, the RV lead was looped in the right atrium in order to enter the RV in a satisfactory, albeit atypical RV location. This patient was successfully defibrillated with a 5 J monophasic waveform delivered between the RV coil, a CS/left SVC coil, and a subcutaneous patch. In conclusion, both of these patients illustrate the ability to use transvenous ICDs successfully in patients with persistent left superior vena cava although the implantation technique deviates substantially from traditional methods.
本报告描述了两例患有持续左侧上腔静脉和右侧上腔静脉闭锁的患者植入经静脉心脏复律除颤器的情况。在第一例中,将导丝经左锁骨下静脉插入上腔静脉的操作被证明是不可能的,这表明左侧上腔静脉起源于左头臂静脉且有一个锐角。改变植入侧并经右锁骨下静脉插入CPI Endotak导管后,导线很容易地经左侧上腔静脉进入冠状窦,然后进入右心房,尖端抵靠右心房侧壁。随后的操作使导管尖端进入右心室尖部,Endotak导线的近端除颤线圈位于左侧上腔静脉下部,其远端界限在与冠状窦的交界处。以5 J的储存能量成功进行了双相波形单路径右心室->左侧上腔静脉的除颤。在第二例患者中,从左锁骨下途径成功植入了经静脉美敦力系统。通过持续存在的左侧上腔静脉和相邻的冠状窦将一个三极右心室线圈插入右心室。由于在第二例中进入右心室需要一个锐角,右心室导线在右心房内呈环状,以便以一种令人满意的方式进入右心室,尽管位置不典型。通过在右心室线圈、冠状窦/左侧上腔静脉线圈和皮下贴片之间输送5 J的单相波形,该患者成功除颤。总之,这两例患者均表明,尽管植入技术与传统方法有很大不同,但在患有持续左侧上腔静脉的患者中成功使用经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器是可行的。