Suppr超能文献

二十三种家用雾化器/压缩机组合的比较。

Comparison of twenty three nebulizer/compressor combinations for domiciliary use.

作者信息

Smith E C, Denyer J, Kendrick A H

机构信息

Respiratory Dept, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1995 Jul;8(7):1214-21. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08071214.

Abstract

We have assessed the physical and dynamic characteristics of 23 home jet nebulizer/compressor combinations currently available in the UK and Europe. The combinations were evaluated in terms of pressure-flow characteristics, aerosol mass distribution, volume output, electrical costs, and sound level. In addition, we determined the effect of nebulizer fill volume on aerosol mass distribution and volume output. One nebulizer was used with six different compressors, and four compressors were tested with three different nebulizers. The pressure-flow relationships showed a wide variation between models, as did flow-rate at the nebulizer (range 3.0-8.0 L.min-1). The mean +/- SD volume nebulized after 10 min using an initial fill volume of 2.5 and 5.0 mL was 46 +/- 9 and 34 +/- 12%, respectively. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) over a 5 min nebulization ranged 2.6 to 10.2 microns. Nine of the nebulizations produced an MMAD of less than 5 microns at both fill volumes. Changing nebulizer/compressor combinations affected flow rate, MMAD and volume output. Sound levels varied between models. Running costs were low, with all using less than 74 kilowatt hours of energy per year. We conclude that there is a wide variation in performance of nebulizer/compressor combinations for use with nebulized bronchodilators. Correct matching of the nebulizer/compressor is seen to be important to ensure optimum performance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们评估了目前在英国和欧洲市面上的23种家用喷射式雾化器/压缩机组合的物理和动态特性。从压力-流量特性、气溶胶质量分布、体积输出、电费成本和噪音水平等方面对这些组合进行了评估。此外,我们还测定了雾化器填充量对气溶胶质量分布和体积输出的影响。使用一台雾化器搭配六种不同的压缩机,并对四台压缩机与三种不同的雾化器进行了测试。压力-流量关系在不同型号之间差异很大,雾化器处的流速也是如此(范围为3.0 - 8.0 L·min⁻¹)。初始填充量为2.5 mL和5.0 mL时,10分钟后雾化的平均±标准差体积分别为46±9%和34±12%。5分钟雾化过程中的质量中值空气动力学直径(MMAD)范围为2.6至10.2微米。在两种填充量下,有九种雾化产生的MMAD小于5微米。改变雾化器/压缩机组合会影响流速、MMAD和体积输出。不同型号的噪音水平有所不同。运行成本较低,所有产品每年的能耗均低于74千瓦时。我们得出结论,用于雾化支气管扩张剂的雾化器/压缩机组合的性能存在很大差异。雾化器/压缩机的正确匹配对于确保最佳性能很重要。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验