• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较单剂量每日一次给药与每日分三次给药的吗氯贝胺治疗重度抑郁发作(DSM-III-R)患者的疗效和耐受性。

A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide given as a single daily dose or in three divided doses per day for the treatment of patients with a major depressive episode (DSM-III-R).

作者信息

Newburn G, Edwards R, Thomas H, Collier J, Fox K, Collins C, Cramer D, Reeves J, Caracatsanis A

机构信息

Rotorua Rehabilitation Centre, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):10S-15S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00004714-199508001-00003
PMID:7593724
Abstract

This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing moclobemide once daily (OD) with three times daily (TDS) dosing. The duration of the study was 6 weeks with the initial dose of moclobemide being 450 mg/day (either 450 mg in the morning or 150 mg three times daily). Placebo tablets were used to ensure that the study was double blind. After 2 weeks, the dose could be increased to 600 mg/day if tolerability was acceptable and efficacy was judged insufficient by the investigator. Patients were assessed at baseline and at days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42. Efficacy was primarily judged on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (17item). Patients had to score at least 17 to enter the study. Safety and tolerability were judged on reported adverse events, safety parameters, premature withdrawals, and a physicians' global tolerability rating. There were also three secondary efficacy parameters--the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Visual Analogue Scales for pain and irritability, and physicians' Clinical Global Impression (CGI). A total of 130 evaluable patients were required to detect a difference of more than 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.8) between groups. A total of 189 patients entered the study, and the standard analysis comprised 145 patients. The efficacies between the two dosing regimens as determined by the HAM-D score and from the CGI were found not to differ significantly. For the standard analysis population, there was a reduction in mean HAM-D of 73.8 and 72.9% for the OD and TDS groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、多中心试验,比较了吗氯贝胺每日一次(OD)给药与每日三次(TDS)给药的效果。研究持续时间为6周,吗氯贝胺初始剂量为450毫克/天(早晨服用450毫克或每日三次,每次150毫克)。使用安慰剂片以确保研究为双盲。2周后,如果耐受性可接受且研究者判断疗效不足,剂量可增至600毫克/天。在基线以及第3、7、14、21、28和42天对患者进行评估。疗效主要根据汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D,17项)进行判断。患者必须至少得17分才能进入研究。根据报告的不良事件、安全参数、提前退出情况以及医生的总体耐受性评分来判断安全性和耐受性。还有三个次要疗效参数——汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表、疼痛和易怒视觉模拟量表以及医生临床总体印象(CGI)。总共需要130名可评估患者来检测两组之间超过20%的差异(α = 0.05,β = 0.8)。共有189名患者进入研究,标准分析包括145名患者。发现通过HAM-D评分和CGI确定的两种给药方案之间的疗效无显著差异。对于标准分析人群,OD组和TDS组的平均HAM-D分别降低了73.8%和72.9%。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide given as a single daily dose or in three divided doses per day for the treatment of patients with a major depressive episode (DSM-III-R).比较单剂量每日一次给药与每日分三次给药的吗氯贝胺治疗重度抑郁发作(DSM-III-R)患者的疗效和耐受性。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):10S-15S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00003.
2
Moclobemide twice daily in the treatment of major depressive episode: a double-blind, multicenter comparison with different three-times-daily dosage schedules.吗氯贝胺每日两次治疗重度抑郁发作:与不同的每日三次给药方案的双盲、多中心比较
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S1-8. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00002.
3
Moclobemide twice daily in the treatment of major depressive episode: a double-blind, multicenter comparison with different three times daily dosage schedules.吗氯贝胺每日两次治疗重度抑郁发作:与不同的每日三次给药方案进行双盲、多中心比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):4S-9S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00002.
4
A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and thioridazine versus moclobemide and placebo in the treatment of refractory, severe depression.吗氯贝胺与硫利达嗪联用及吗氯贝胺与安慰剂联用治疗难治性重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):41S-45S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00008.
5
Moclobemide versus clomipramine in depressed patients in general practice. A randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter study.在普通门诊抑郁症患者中比较吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明:一项随机、双盲、平行、多中心研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):24S-30S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00005.
6
Moclobemide versus fluoxetine for double depression: a randomized double-blind study.吗氯贝胺与氟西汀治疗双重抑郁的随机双盲研究
J Psychiatr Res. 1996 Nov-Dec;30(6):453-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00030-1.
7
Multicenter double-blind study of moclobemide and maprotiline.吗氯贝胺与马普替林的多中心双盲研究。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S38-49. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00006.
8
Moclobemide versus fluoxetine in the treatment of inpatients with major depression.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):35S-40S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00007.
9
Efficacy and safety of moclobemide compared with maprotiline in treatment of major depressive disorder. A double-blind multicenter study with parallel groups.吗氯贝胺与马普替林治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和安全性比较。一项双盲平行组多中心研究。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1993 Nov;26(6):246-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014362.
10
Moclobemide and sertraline in the treatment of depressive disorders: a comparative study.吗氯贝胺与舍曲林治疗抑郁症的比较研究
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1995 May-Jun;95(3):139-51.