Newburn G, Edwards R, Thomas H, Collier J, Fox K, Collins C, Cramer D, Reeves J, Caracatsanis A
Rotorua Rehabilitation Centre, New Zealand.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Aug;15(4 Suppl 2):10S-15S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199508001-00003.
This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing moclobemide once daily (OD) with three times daily (TDS) dosing. The duration of the study was 6 weeks with the initial dose of moclobemide being 450 mg/day (either 450 mg in the morning or 150 mg three times daily). Placebo tablets were used to ensure that the study was double blind. After 2 weeks, the dose could be increased to 600 mg/day if tolerability was acceptable and efficacy was judged insufficient by the investigator. Patients were assessed at baseline and at days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42. Efficacy was primarily judged on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (17item). Patients had to score at least 17 to enter the study. Safety and tolerability were judged on reported adverse events, safety parameters, premature withdrawals, and a physicians' global tolerability rating. There were also three secondary efficacy parameters--the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Visual Analogue Scales for pain and irritability, and physicians' Clinical Global Impression (CGI). A total of 130 evaluable patients were required to detect a difference of more than 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.8) between groups. A total of 189 patients entered the study, and the standard analysis comprised 145 patients. The efficacies between the two dosing regimens as determined by the HAM-D score and from the CGI were found not to differ significantly. For the standard analysis population, there was a reduction in mean HAM-D of 73.8 and 72.9% for the OD and TDS groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、多中心试验,比较了吗氯贝胺每日一次(OD)给药与每日三次(TDS)给药的效果。研究持续时间为6周,吗氯贝胺初始剂量为450毫克/天(早晨服用450毫克或每日三次,每次150毫克)。使用安慰剂片以确保研究为双盲。2周后,如果耐受性可接受且研究者判断疗效不足,剂量可增至600毫克/天。在基线以及第3、7、14、21、28和42天对患者进行评估。疗效主要根据汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D,17项)进行判断。患者必须至少得17分才能进入研究。根据报告的不良事件、安全参数、提前退出情况以及医生的总体耐受性评分来判断安全性和耐受性。还有三个次要疗效参数——汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表、疼痛和易怒视觉模拟量表以及医生临床总体印象(CGI)。总共需要130名可评估患者来检测两组之间超过20%的差异(α = 0.05,β = 0.8)。共有189名患者进入研究,标准分析包括145名患者。发现通过HAM-D评分和CGI确定的两种给药方案之间的疗效无显著差异。对于标准分析人群,OD组和TDS组的平均HAM-D分别降低了73.8%和72.9%。(摘要截选至250字)