Gagiano C A, Hart G A, Bodemer W, Schall R
Department of Psychiatry, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994;17 Suppl 1:S1-8. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00002.
Data on a twice-daily dosage schedule with moclobemide in the treatment of depression is limited. In this study, moclobemide 150 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) was compared to two different three-times-daily (t.i.d.) regimens with total daily dosages of 300 and 450 mg, respectively, over a 6-week period. The study was randomized, double-blind, and conducted at three university centers. Efficacy was measured on the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating Scales, on the Zung Scale, and on clinical global impression. Tolerability and safety were assessed through adverse events and vital signs and on clinical global impression. One hundred seventy-eight depressed outpatients were included, and 158 completed the study. The treatment groups were comparable at baseline. No clear differences between the treatment groups could be shown with respect to efficacy. There was, however, a slightly larger decrease in the total HAM-A score in the groups receiving 150 mg b.i.d. and t.i.d. than in the third group. There were no marked differences between the groups with respect to tolerability and safety. Tolerability was rated "good" or "excellent" in 94% of patients, and there was no appreciable change in vital signs in any of the treatment groups. Moclobemide 150 mg b.i.d. is the optimal initial schedule for treatment of depression.
关于吗氯贝胺每日两次给药方案治疗抑郁症的数据有限。在本研究中,将每日两次、每次150毫克的吗氯贝胺与两种不同的每日三次给药方案进行了比较,这两种方案的每日总剂量分别为300毫克和450毫克,为期6周。该研究为随机、双盲研究,在三个大学中心进行。通过汉密尔顿抑郁和焦虑评定量表、zung量表以及临床总体印象来衡量疗效。通过不良事件、生命体征以及临床总体印象来评估耐受性和安全性。纳入了178名抑郁症门诊患者,158名完成了研究。各治疗组在基线时具有可比性。在疗效方面,各治疗组之间未显示出明显差异。然而,每日两次和每日三次服用150毫克组的汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)总分下降幅度略大于第三组。在耐受性和安全性方面,各组之间没有显著差异。94%的患者耐受性被评为“良好”或“优秀”,任何治疗组的生命体征均无明显变化。每日两次服用150毫克吗氯贝胺是治疗抑郁症的最佳初始给药方案。