Thole J E, Janson A A, Kifle A, Howe R C, McLean K, Nurilygn A, Filley E, Shannon E J, Bulla G J, Hermans J
Department of Immunohaematology and Bloodbank, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1995 Sep;63(3):369-80.
The recognition of a panel of recombinant Mycobacterium leprae antigens by T cells and B cells from 29 borderline tuberculoid/tuberculoid (BT/TT) and 18 lepromatous leprosy (LL) patients and from 21 healthy controls (HC) in leprosy-endemic regions of Ethiopia was examined. All 11 antigenic molecules tested (including M. leprae hsp 10, hsp18, hsp65 and several novel M. leprae antigens) were shown to be recognized by T cells, but clear quantitative differences existed between reactivities induced by individual antigens. Similar quantitative differences were observed when antibody responses to hsp10 and hsp65 antigens were determined. No associations were found between the antigen-specific responses and the subject status of either BT/TT and LL patients or HC. Fifteen percent of the patients who were nonresponsive to sonicates of M. leprae showed significant T-cell responses to one or more individual M. leprae antigens. This indicates that M. leprae constituents other than the proteins tested are responsible for the M. leprae-specific nonresponsiveness in these patients, which may be exploited for the design of vaccines or immunotherapeutic modalities aimed at inducing M. leprae-specific immunity in nonresponders.
对来自埃塞俄比亚麻风病流行地区的29名界线类偏结核型/结核型(BT/TT)和18名瘤型麻风(LL)患者以及21名健康对照(HC)的T细胞和B细胞识别一组重组麻风分枝杆菌抗原的情况进行了检测。所测试的全部11种抗原分子(包括麻风分枝杆菌hsp 10、hsp18、hsp65以及几种新型麻风分枝杆菌抗原)均被T细胞识别,但各个抗原诱导的反应性之间存在明显的定量差异。在测定对hsp10和hsp65抗原的抗体反应时也观察到了类似的定量差异。在抗原特异性反应与BT/TT和LL患者或HC的受试者状态之间未发现关联。15%对麻风分枝杆菌超声裂解物无反应的患者对一种或多种单个麻风分枝杆菌抗原表现出显著的T细胞反应。这表明,除所测试的蛋白质外,麻风分枝杆菌的其他成分是这些患者中麻风分枝杆菌特异性无反应性的原因,这可用于设计旨在在无反应者中诱导麻风分枝杆菌特异性免疫的疫苗或免疫治疗方法。