• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[伦理学对重症监护实践的贡献]

[Contributions of ethics to the practice of intensive care].

作者信息

Doucet H

机构信息

Faculté de théologie, Université Saint-Paul, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995 Jun 10;125(23):1138-44.

PMID:7597401
Abstract

Intensive care, one of the greatest achievements of modern medicine, is not without its problems. In what sense could ethics contribute towards an intensive care medicine which would be humane and respectful of what it means to be sick? After having presented a phenomenology of what it means to be sick and in intensive care, the author proposes an ethical framework which could guide the decision-making of physicians specialized in the field. This framework has three levels. Level one deals with the basic values of benevolence and autonomy which are those of medicine itself. Level two deals with the implementation of these values, which bioethics sees as conflicting. Implementation is achieved by "conversation" between the physician and the patient. Finally, the physician is invited to question his or her own attitude towards the unavoidable dilemmas created by the paradoxes and contradictions of modern medicine.

摘要

重症监护作为现代医学最伟大的成就之一,也并非没有问题。从何种意义上讲,伦理学能够对一种人道且尊重患病意义的重症监护医学有所贡献呢?在阐述了患病及处于重症监护状态意味着什么的现象学之后,作者提出了一个伦理框架,该框架可指导该领域专科医生的决策。这个框架有三个层面。第一个层面涉及仁爱和自主的基本价值观,这些也是医学本身的价值观。第二个层面涉及这些价值观的实施,生物伦理学认为这些价值观相互冲突。实施是通过医生与患者之间的“对话”来实现的。最后,医生被要求审视自己对现代医学的悖论和矛盾所造成的不可避免的困境的态度。

相似文献

1
[Contributions of ethics to the practice of intensive care].[伦理学对重症监护实践的贡献]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995 Jun 10;125(23):1138-44.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
4
Ethical conflicts in home care. Patient autonomy and physician advocacy.家庭护理中的伦理冲突。患者自主权与医生的支持。
Can Fam Physician. 1997 Dec;43:2136-42.
5
Attitudes and practices of patients and physicians towards patient autonomy: a survey conducted prior to the enactment of the Patients' Rights Bill in Israel.患者与医生对患者自主权的态度及行为:以色列《患者权利法案》颁布前进行的一项调查。
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2000 Jul;10(4):119-25.
6
Medical ethics and ethical dilemmas.医学伦理与伦理困境。
Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):8-16.
7
[Basic ethical considerations in intensive care--Switzerland, a pluralistic country].[重症监护中的基本伦理考量——瑞士,一个多元化国家]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995 Jun 10;125(23):1145-50.
8
[Ethics and law in intensive therapy].[重症治疗中的伦理与法律]
Orv Hetil. 2002 Aug 25;143(34):1991-5.
9
Ethics.伦理学
Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1996 Oct;5(3):673-84.
10
Ethical considerations.伦理考量。
Crit Care Clin. 1993 Oct;9(4):775-89.