• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Long vs. short monitoring intervals for peach harvesters exposed to foliar azinphos-methyl residues.

作者信息

Spencer J R, Sanborn J R, Hernandez B Z, Krieger R I, Margetich S S, Schneider F A

机构信息

California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento 95814-5624, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 1995 Jun;78(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03227-c.

DOI:10.1016/0378-4274(95)03227-c
PMID:7604395
Abstract

A dermal monitoring study of peach harvesters exposed to azinphos-methyl (AM) residues was conducted in Sutter County, California. Harvesters were paid by piecework, which allowed characterization of the relationship between dermal exposure (DE) and time or production. Workers wore 2 long-sleeved knit T-shirts for each monitoring interval and also provided a hand residue sample. Dislodgeable foliar residue (DFR) samples were also collected. The highest correlations were found for inner shirts vs. production and DE vs. time worked (r2 = 0.67, P < 0.01). DE was greatest after 2-h exposures and reached equilibrium after 3 h, indicating that exposure estimates from shorter intervals would overestimate exposure.

摘要

相似文献

1
Long vs. short monitoring intervals for peach harvesters exposed to foliar azinphos-methyl residues.
Toxicol Lett. 1995 Jun;78(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03227-c.
2
Harvesters in strawberry fields: A literature review of pesticide exposure, an observation of their work activities, and a model for exposure prediction.草莓田中的采摘工:农药暴露的文献综述、其工作活动观察及暴露预测模型
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;27(4):391-397. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.36. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
3
Assessment of azinphosmethyl exposure in California peach harvest workers.
Arch Environ Health. 1994 Jul-Aug;49(4):289-96. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1994.9937482.
4
Monitoring Peach Harvest Workers Exposed to Azinphosmethyl Residues in Sutter County, California, 1991.1991年对加利福尼亚州萨特县接触谷硫磷残留的桃子采摘工人进行监测
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Jun;102(6-7):580-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102580.
5
Comparison of three methods for assessment of hand exposure to azinphos-methyl (Guthion) during apple thinning.苹果疏果期间三种评估手部对谷硫磷(谷赛昂)暴露量方法的比较
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999 Sep;14(9):618-23. doi: 10.1080/104732299302422.
6
The Importance of Hand Exposures to Absorbed Dosage of Hand Harvesters.手部暴露对手工收割者吸收剂量的重要性。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2015;78(21-22):1369-83. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2015.1092900. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Work characteristics and pesticide exposures among migrant agricultural families: a community-based research approach.流动农业家庭的工作特征与农药暴露:一种基于社区的研究方法。
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 May;109(5):533-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109533.
8
Liquid chromatographic determination of azinphos methyl oxon in foliar dislodgeable residues and in soil surface dusts from an azinphos methyl-treated orange grove.液相色谱法测定甲基谷硫磷处理过的柑橘园中叶面可去除残留物和土壤表面灰尘中的甲基谷硫磷氧。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1977 Jul;60(4):911-7.
9
Impact of dermal absorption factors in occupational exposure assessment: comparison of two models for agricultural reentry workers exposed to azinphosmethyl.
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2003 Sep;18(9):669-77. doi: 10.1080/10473220301383.
10
Farmworker exposure to organophosphorus pesticide residues during apple thinning in central Washington State.华盛顿州中部苹果疏果期间农场工人接触有机磷农药残留的情况。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1999 Nov-Dec;60(6):752-61. doi: 10.1080/00028899908984498.

引用本文的文献

1
Harvesters in strawberry fields: A literature review of pesticide exposure, an observation of their work activities, and a model for exposure prediction.草莓田中的采摘工:农药暴露的文献综述、其工作活动观察及暴露预测模型
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;27(4):391-397. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.36. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
2
Community-based intervention to reduce pesticide exposure to farmworkers and potential take-home exposure to their families.基于社区的干预措施,以减少农场工人接触农药以及其家庭潜在的带回家接触风险。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):79-89. doi: 10.1038/jes.2008.18. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
3
Workplace, household, and personal predictors of pesticide exposure for farmworkers.
农场工人农药暴露的工作场所、家庭及个人预测因素。
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jun;114(6):943-52. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8529.