Suppr超能文献

游泳与负重活动对月经正常运动员骨矿物质状况的不同影响。

Differential effects of swimming versus weight-bearing activity on bone mineral status of eumenorrheic athletes.

作者信息

Taaffe D R, Snow-Harter C, Connolly D A, Robinson T L, Brown M D, Marcus R

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Apr;10(4):586-93. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100411.

Abstract

To examine the role of skeletal loading patterns on bone mineral density (BMD), we compared eumenorrheic athletes who chronically trained by opposite forms of skeletal loading, intensive weight-bearing activity (gymnastics, n = 13), and nonweightbearing activity (swimming, n = 26) and 19 nonathletic controls. BMD (g/cm2) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter, and whole body was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subregion analysis of the whole body scan permitted BMD evaluation of diverse regions. Swimmers were taller (p = 0.0001), heavier (p < 0.005), and had a greater bone-free lean mass (p < 0.001) than gymnasts and nonathletic controls. When adjusted for body surface area, there was no difference in lean mass between swimmers and gymnasts, and both were higher than controls (p < 0.01). Gymnasts had a lower (p < 0.005) fat mass than swimmers and controls. There were no group differences for spine or whole body BMD, but gymnasts had higher spine BMD corrected for body mass than either swimmers or controls. Gymnasts (1.117 +/- 0.110) had higher femoral neck BMD than controls (0.974 +/- 0.105), who were higher than swimmers (0.875 +/- 0.105) (p = 0.0001). This result still applied when BMD was normalized for body weight and bone size. Trochanter BMD of gymnasts (0.898 +/- 0.130) was also higher than controls (0.784 +/- 0.097) and swimmers (0.748 +/- 0.085) (p = 0.0002), and remained higher when corrected for body mass.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为研究骨骼负荷模式对骨密度(BMD)的作用,我们比较了长期通过两种相反形式的骨骼负荷进行训练的月经正常的运动员,即高强度负重活动(体操,n = 13)和非负重活动(游泳,n = 26),以及19名非运动员对照者。采用双能X线吸收法(DXA)评估腰椎、股骨颈、大转子和全身的骨密度(g/cm²)。全身扫描的亚区域分析可对不同区域的骨密度进行评估。游泳运动员比体操运动员和非运动员对照者更高(p = 0.0001)、更重(p < 0.005),且无脂肪瘦体重更大(p < 0.001)。调整体表面积后,游泳运动员和体操运动员的瘦体重无差异,且两者均高于对照者(p < 0.01)。体操运动员的脂肪量低于游泳运动员和对照者(p < 0.005)。脊柱或全身骨密度在各组间无差异,但校正体重后的脊柱骨密度,体操运动员高于游泳运动员和对照者。体操运动员(1.117±0.110)的股骨颈骨密度高于对照者(0.974±0.105),对照者高于游泳运动员(0.875±0.105)(p = 0.0001)。当骨密度按体重和骨骼大小进行标准化后,该结果仍然成立。体操运动员的大转子骨密度(0.898±0.130)也高于对照者(0.784±0.097)和游泳运动员(0.748±0.085)(p = 0.0002),校正体重后仍较高。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验