Pitt B
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
Cardiology. 1995;86 Suppl 1:41-5. doi: 10.1159/000176945.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) have been shown to be effective in improving symptoms and survival in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction. Despite their proven benefits the use of ACE inhibitors is still limited in many parts of the western world. In part, the underutilization of ACE inhibitors is due to the occurrence of side effects such as cough, renal dysfunction and first dose hypotension. These side effects are in part due to ACE inhibitor-induced bradykinin formation. Blockade of the effects of angiotensin II can however also be achieved with an angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent such as losartan. To determine the relative safety and effectiveness of ACE inhibitors compared to an angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent the evaluation of losartan and the elderly trial (Elite) is comparing the ACE inhibitor captopril to the angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent losartan in elderly patients. When used ACE inhibitors are often given in doses lower than those shown to be effective in reducing mortality in the major randomized trials. Several trials are currently under way comparing low to high doses of ACE inhibitors which should provide information on the need to achieve the doses used in the major mortality studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE抑制剂)已被证明可有效改善收缩期左心室功能不全患者的症状并提高其生存率。尽管ACE抑制剂已证实有诸多益处,但在西方世界的许多地区,其使用仍然有限。部分原因在于,ACE抑制剂未得到充分利用是由于出现了诸如咳嗽、肾功能不全和首剂低血压等副作用。这些副作用部分归因于ACE抑制剂诱导的缓激肽形成。然而,使用诸如氯沙坦之类的血管紧张素II 1型受体阻断剂也能够实现对血管紧张素II作用的阻断。为了确定与血管紧张素II 1型受体阻断剂相比,ACE抑制剂的相对安全性和有效性,氯沙坦与老年患者试验(ELITE)正在将ACE抑制剂卡托普利与血管紧张素II 1型受体阻断剂氯沙坦在老年患者中进行比较。使用ACE抑制剂时,其给药剂量往往低于那些在主要随机试验中显示可有效降低死亡率的剂量。目前正在进行多项试验,比较低剂量与高剂量的ACE抑制剂,这应该能提供有关是否需要达到主要死亡率研究中所用剂量的信息。(摘要截短于250词)